By Roger Anghis.
The last but very important point is our Founders did not want a foreign entity to be able to hold the highest office in the land, the presidency. That’s why they called for what is referred to as a Natural Born Citizen to be able to hold that office. The Constitution does not define exactly what a Natural Born Citizen is. So say it is someone born in America but that is not the proper definition. When we have a situation like this we have to go back and find out what the Founders understood what a Natural born Citizen was. To do that we have to go back to British law, which is the basis for most of our original laws. The term “natural born” citizen has a long history in British common law. In fact, a law passed in 1677 law says that “natural born” citizens include people born overseas to British citizens. This usage was undoubtedly known to John Jay, who had children born overseas while he was serving as a diplomat. 3 Notice that is says ‘born overseas to British citizens.’ What this means is both parents have to be citizens for the child to be a Natural Born Citizen.
This brings up major questions about Barack Obama, which I wrote about on numerous occasions, because his father, Barack Obama Sr., was never a citizen of America. He was a British subject. That being the case under international law Obama, Jr. was a British citizen. There were so many other things that clouded Obama too. The first birth certificate posted on his website proved to be a fake. The name of the hospital on the certificate was not the name of the hospital when Obama was supposedly born there. The name was changed about four years later. Also, there were ‘layers’ on that certificate and fonts that weren’t invented until the 1970’s. Sheriff Joe Arpio from Arizona spent a year investigating this certificate and found it to be fake. A years-long forensics investigation into the computer image of the long-form Hawaiian birth certificate image that Barack Obama released during a White House news conference during his first term and presented to the American people as an official government document concluded it is “fake.”
The probe also confirms that those who were subjected to the derogatory “birther” label from many media outlets and Democrats were right – at least regarding the document used to establish Obama’s eligibility to be president. 1
That information was never presented to any court or to Congress so our Constitution could be upheld. That was the Democrat Party but nobody in the Republican Party pushed the matter either. There are great ramifications to this as everything he did, every law he signed, every Executive Order he issued has to be declared null and void. Nothing was done. Nothing!
Then we have the Republican Party and Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio. Rubio’s simple. He was born in America but neither of his parents were citizens at the time of his birth making him ineligible, but the Republicans said nothing. Ted Cruz was born in Canada and his dad didn’t become a citizen until 2006. He claims his mother was a citizen but she was found to be on the voter roles in Canada the year he was born, 1970. Therein lies the problem. In 1970 you had to be a citizen of Canada to vote in Canada. Cruz claims his mother had dual citizenship but that is a problem as Canada did not allow dual citizenship untill 1977. To compound this his mother never filed the Consular Report of Birth Abroad form to claim Ted’s citizenship. From this information he isn’t eligible to be a senator from Texas or any other state.
We come to Kamala Harris. Neith of her parents were citizens when she was born so she is not eligibli either. Her mother immigrated to America in 1960 and her father came in 1961 and Kamala was born in 1964. It take longer than three years to become a citizen.
Ignoring the guidelines of our Constitution concerning who we have in office is a Constitutional Crisis.
The argument that the 14th Amendment automatically makes a person born in America a citizen does not hold water. The 14th Amendment was passed to give slaves citizenship and the children they bore while here. But anyone born on US soil is a citizen. First of all the 14th Amendment state “anyone born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States”. A foreigner is not ‘under the jurisdiction of the United States.’ In fact the author of the amendment, Senator Jacob M. Howard, even stated; “This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other persons.” So the author, and he should know, states that aliens here that have a child does NOT qualify for citizenship. This has been a ploy by the Democrats to increase their voting base for over a hundred years.
We could look at Ilan Omar. She married her brother to get him into the United States. That’s called immigration fraud. That should be grounds for deportation, yet no one is doing a thing about it.
Then we have Rashida Tlabi, representative from Michigan. It is required that you live in the district that you represent. Her father has stated that she used a fake address on her election affidavit. He said his daughter misrepresented her residency when she signed an election affidavit in 2008 with the Wayne County Clerk claiming she was a citizen of Detroit.
According to that affidavit, Tlaib claimed she lived at 9123 Rathbone in Detroit. That house is owned in part by her father, Harbi Elabed, and he now says she did not live there and he was only recently made aware that she had claimed so.
Dearborn is not a part of the 12th House District that Tlaib was elected to represent.
Residency issues are very difficult to prove. To become a candidate, you must be a “registered and qualified elector” of that district, according to state law. That means you must have your primary residence — the address on your driver’s license and where you’re registered to vote — in that district. 2 Allowing these actions from our ‘elected officails’ to go unchallenged is a Constitutional Crisis.
Our country can be lost in an election. Had Hillary won in 2016 the great American experiment would have been over. If the Democrats win in 2020 our days will be numbered. Democrats want us under a New World Order. They want control. We the People have to take a stand against this assult on our nation. Representative Nadler found Attorney General Barr in contempt of Congress for his refusal to break the law a constitutional crisis yet he never said a word when Eric Holder was found in contempt of Congress. There was no crisis then, why is there one now? It’s because they are afraid that too many will be exposed about their attempted coup. All these things that have been discussed are a threat to our government. That is the true Constitutional Crisis.
© Roger Anghis