A temporary court injunction has halted the Biden administration’s new rule intended to tighten gun sales regulations at shows and online.
Reuters reported that U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk issued a temporary restraining order against the Biden administration’s latest gun control measure. This decision, made on May 19, targets a rule that would require gun dealers operating at gun shows and online to obtain licenses and conduct mandatory background checks.
Introduced last month, the rule sought to address the long-discussed “gun show loophole.” For years, critics have argued that private gun sellers at shows and online venues have been able to bypass the stringent checks required of established gun stores.
The administration aimed to bring over 23,000 unlicensed dealers into compliance, significantly impacting many transactions annually.
However, the enforcement of this rule was contested by the state of Texas, supported by gun rights advocates and three other Republican-led states, leading to a lawsuit. They argued that the new rule overstepped legal boundaries set for gun control measures.
Judge Kacsmaryk’s History With Conservative Rulings
Judge Kacsmaryk, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, has a history of supporting conservative causes through his judicial decisions.
His ruling on this particular case noted several issues with the new rule’s scope and implementation. He pointed out that it contradicted aspects of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act and overlooked a statutory exemption meant for individuals purchasing guns for personal protection.
This isn’t the first time Judge Kacsmaryk has been at the center of contentious policy debates. His previous work includes a notable decision where he suspended the approval of the abortion pill mifepristone—a decision currently held pending a review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
His consistent alignment with conservative viewpoints has made him a pivotal figure in the ongoing dialogue between federal policy and individual state interests.
As part of his ruling, Judge Kacsmaryk did not extend the temporary restraining order to the states of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Utah, finding that they lacked standing to challenge the rule. This selective enforcement underscores the complex nature of jurisdiction in matters of national policy, especially those as divisive as gun control.
The Department of Justice, which defends the implementation of such rules, has yet to respond to this setback. This silence is notable, given the DOJ’s usual promptness in addressing challenges to federal authority.
Meanwhile, advocacy groups have been vocal in their approval or criticism of the court’s decision.
Paxton, the Attorney General from Texas, openly celebrated the injunction, stating, “I am relieved that we were able to secure a restraining order that will prevent this illegal rule from taking effect.” His assertion that the rule is “illegal” reflects the heated nature of the current debate.
Immediate Future of Gun Control Measures
The court order is set to remain in effect until June 2, pending further litigation. This gives both opponents and supporters of the rule a short window to bolster their legal arguments before the next court session.
Gun rights groups like Gun Owners of America, which boasts around 2 million members, have especially welcomed the ruling.
They argue that the new rule represents an overreach of federal power over constitutionally guaranteed rights.
In summary, the temporary block of the Biden administration’s gun control rule by Judge Kacsmaryk is a significant chapter in the ongoing saga of gun rights and regulatory efforts in the United States. It underscores the complexities involved in balancing public safety, legal boundaries, and individual rights. Moving forward, all eyes will be on the upcoming litigations and their implications not only for gun laws but for broader national policies concerning individual freedoms and federal oversight.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Staff Writers
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://patriotmomdigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.