Trending correlations were more than enough for oncology experts to call for a full stop to mRNA injections as the presence of “turbo cancer” appeared “statistically more significant.”
In the wake of a global campaign of extremes, from incentivized coercion to mandates, around receiving one or many doses of Big Pharma’s injectable response to COVID-19, those who bucked The Science™ for the traditional scientific method remained dedicated to understanding what adverse impacts may have developed from the shots.
Earlier this month, molecular biology researcher in cell biology and cancer genetics Dr. Maarten Fornerod spoke to one such effort looking at Japan and how one of the world’s most committed populations to the COVID shots had also seen a reverse in what had been declining cancer rates.
In particular, Fornerod addressed a study published on April 8, 2024, titled, “Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan,” and voiced his concern about rising rates of aggressive cancer dubbed “turbo cancer.”
Dr Maarten Fornerod joins Christof Plothe, DO to discuss the growing evidence linking mRNA Covid injections to cancer in 30 mins on today’s episode of Better Way Today.
Join us live right here on Twitter. pic.twitter.com/LpETYKEBe9
— World Council for Health (WCH) (@FreeWCH) May 6, 2024
“So in 2021 it’s already significant and in 2022 it becomes statistically more significant,” he explained after showing the steady decline in cancer rates across Japan from 2010 to 2020 before the society upended in response to COVID.
Fornerod made note of the growing number of clinician reports that supported the position that the shots had a correlation, if not causation, to rising cancer rates and also pointed to some reactions to the mRNA injections that had previously been considered controversial, like suppression of the immune system.
“But of course, these are anecdotes. But I think anecdotes from clinicians you could probably have to take seriously because a good doctor has experience and has some sort of filter, historical filter, of when things are unusual,” he expressed.
Among the doctors who’d been on the frontline calling for transparency and more thorough research, along with raising alarm bells over the startling conclusions they had drawn, were the likes of renowned cardiologist, epidemiologist and internist Dr. Peter McCullough, as well as Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Angus Dalgliesh and many more.
The McCullough Foundation took to social media on Sunday and highlighted a study published online Saturday with the Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports with the caption, “BREAKING — New study links @pfizer COVID-10 mRNA injections to rare form of aggressive cancer called Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma (AITL). Shortly following both injections, the 60-year old patient experienced lymph node enlargement. A right axillary lymph node biopsy was done, which revealed AITL. The carcinogenic products are still recommended by the @CDCgov for individuals aged 6 months and older.”
BREAKING – New study links @pfizer COVID-19 mRNA injections to rare form of aggressive cancer called Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma (AITL).
Shortly following both injections, the 60-year old patient experienced lymph node enlargement. A right axillary lymph node biopsy was… pic.twitter.com/Y23aER8C6u
— McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) May 19, 2024
Elsewhere on social media, Cole was heard pointing to his own witnessed anecdotes that cases of cancer “took off like wildfire” after the shots had been introduced to society.
Likewise, Dalgliesh had appeared on GBNews and asserted, “I was able to show [cancer] relapses started around three weeks to three months of their booster vaccine. It’s association, it doesn’t mean it’s causal, and I’d be first to say that.”
Fornerod further remarked on the lack of long-term understanding of potential consequences from the shots and indicated, “I mean, clearly irresponsible because there was no long-term safety data and there was no genotoxic studies, and there was no carcinogenic studies — not even in mice.”
The overall picture led him to conclude, “In my opinion, there’s enough strong evidence linking mRNA vaccines to cancer, and then in addition to the safety signal of Japan to say, okay, it’s time to stop.”
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Kevin Haggerty
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.bizpacreview.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.