It’s another busy day in my spine surgery clinic when my phone rings. Patients are waiting, but I’d be unwise to put off the caller: a physician calling from a health insurance company. This peer-to-peer call is part of the prior authorization process; my “peer” needs information to determine whether the company will cover a procedure I requested for one of my patients.
Sometimes the conversation goes uneventfully. The “peer” and I establish that the service is medically necessary, and it quickly gets approved. But it usually feels like talking to a wall — a distant voice reading scripted questions off a computer screen — and I sense this is a box-checking exercise destined to result in a predetermined denial. Missing is any discussion of the nuances of the patient’s case or the clinical reasoning behind my request, based on more than two decades of clinical practice and the thousands of similar patients I’ve treated.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Matthew Walker
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.statnews.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.