REPORT: NYT columnist blasts Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal

FOXNEWS.COM:

David Brooks, the center-right political columnist at The New York Times, on Sunday said that he could never support a candidate who backs the Green New Deal because it would concentrate power in the “hands of the Washington elite” at a level not seen since WWII.

Brooks half-joked that today’s Democratic field appears to take the position “somewhere to the left of Che Guevara.”

The article goes on to state the following:

He said Democrats have done a good job in distancing themselves from moderates who could be swayed from supporting Trump.

Brooks said that under the Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal, Washington “planners” would take over the energy business, take over the transportation business and take over health care.

CLICK HERE to learn how you can send a powerful message that SOCIALISM is NOT ACCEPTABLE in America, with a beautiful, patriotic, just-released BUMPER STICKER!

To get more information about this article, please visit FOXNEWS.COM. To weigh in, leave a comment below.

The post REPORT: NYT columnist blasts Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal appeared first on DML News.

Visit the USSA News store!
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Team DML


This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://dmlnews.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact the USSANews.com administrator by using the contact form located in the top-left menu. Your request will be immediately honored. Please visit https://dmlnews.com for more terrific, conservative content. The owner of this website may be paid to recommend American Bullion. The content of this website, including the positive review of American Bullion, the negative review of its competitors, and any other information may not be independent or neutral.