Potential editor in chief called on paper to embrace bias
The Stanford College Republicans published two screenshots they argue proves The Stanford Daily is a “leftist propaganda outlet masquerading as an impartial news source.” The screenshots are of a platform written by a candidate running for the position of editor in chief of the student paper.
The post also included two screenshots of a candidate’s platform for editor in chief. The screenshots of the platform show the candidate, a current staff member of the paper, calling on the publication to embrace outright that it is a leftist publication, a viewpoint that already “permeates throughout the paper.”
“Shirking away from this or pretending that we offer truly unbiased reporting is not only intellectually dishonest, but also hinders us from pursuing the topics and ideas that matter and can make a difference,” the candidate wrote.
He also called on the paper’s news team to “offer a corrective in the form of more diverse opinions around campus.”
In their Facebook post published Sunday night, the College Republicans accused the paper’s reporters of stalking the group’s private events, publishing “completely false stories,” and defending “the violent anti-Semitic RA, Hamzeh Daoud,” who apologized and stepped down from his position as resident assistant after posting on Facebook that he wanted to “physically fight” Zionists.
The Stanford Daily responded with a letter from the paper’s current Editor in Chief defending the paper’s reporting, writing that the “internally-circulated documents do not articulate the views of The Daily as an institution,” and the candidate’s positions are debated and questioned throughout the election process.
“As is the norm at newspapers nationally, The Daily maintains a firm divide between its News and Opinions sections,” editor in chief Courtney Douglas responded in her letter.
“As with all other papers, despite our best efforts, we occasionally slip out of the objectivity that our craft demands, or otherwise make mistakes,” she continued. “In these cases, we are transparent in our corrections and unrelenting in our quest to do better in our future coverage.”
She also addressed the controversy surrounding Daoud, and wrote that the College Republicans conflated the paper’s news coverage with its editorial stances.
“This only reveals that the group either misunderstands, or refuses to see, the news-editorial divide that ensures reporting free of bias,” she wrote.
Visit the USSA News store!
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: College Fix Staff
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.thecollegefix.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact the USSANews.com administrator by using the contact form located in the top-left menu. Your request will be immediately honored. Please visit https://www.thecollegefix.com for more terrific, conservative content. The owner of this website may be paid to recommend American Bullion. The content of this website, including the positive review of American Bullion, the negative review of its competitors, and any other information may not be independent or neutral.