Donald Trump is gearing up to bring the heavy hand of federal power to Democratic strongholds, starting with Chicago and potentially Baltimore next.
The Daily Mail reported that Trump is expanding military-style crackdowns to cities under Democratic leadership, with National Guard troops expected in Chicago and a stern warning issued to Baltimore as a possible follow-up target.
Last week, Trump floated the idea of sending troops to both Chicago and New York, signaling his frustration with what he sees as failed local governance.
His strategy echoes the robust military presence already seen in Washington, D.C., where thousands of National Guard and federal law enforcement officers are patrolling the streets. It’s a bold move, and one that’s already stirring the pot.
Chicago in the Crosshairs for National Guard
On Sunday, a U.S. official told ABC News that the Pentagon is actively planning to deploy troops to Chicago, following Trump’s pointed remarks about the city’s leadership. “Chicago is a mess,” Trump declared, calling the mayor “grossly incompetent” and promising a swift fix. Well, if that’s not a gauntlet thrown down, what is?
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson isn’t rolling out the welcome mat, though, insisting the city doesn’t need a “military occupation” and vowing to sue if troops are deployed.
He’s also noted a complete lack of communication from the White House on this matter. Sounds like a showdown is brewing, and it’s not hard to see why conservatives might cheer a federal push against urban crime—though legal battles could muddy the waters.
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker echoed Johnson’s stance, arguing there’s no emergency to justify such a deployment. “Donald Trump is attempting to manufacture a crisis,” Pritzker said, accusing the president of politicizing the military.
While the concern over federal overreach is worth a nod, many on the right might argue that Chicago’s persistent issues call for drastic measures, not more hand-wringing.
Baltimore got its own warning on Sunday, with Trump suggesting he might “send in the troops” rather than accept an invitation from Maryland Governor Wes Moore to tour the city and discuss public safety.
Moore, who has criticized Trump’s use of federal power in D.C., didn’t mince words either, accusing Trump of hiding behind a desk instead of engaging on the ground. A bit of a cheap shot, perhaps, when Trump’s supporters would argue he’s prioritizing action over photo ops.
Trump fired back, questioning Moore’s record and even bringing up a past controversy over a Bronze Star claim on a fellowship application.
“Did Wes Moore lie about getting a Bronze Star?” Trump asked pointedly. While personal jabs like these might distract from the policy debate, they highlight the deep tensions between federal and state leaders on crime solutions.
Interestingly, Baltimore’s violent crime rate has actually dropped recently, with homicides down 24% last year and overall violent crime falling nearly 8% between 2023 and 2024. Property crimes also saw a 20% decline. So, is Trump targeting a city on the mend, or is this a preemptive strike to ensure progress sticks?
Washington, D.C. Sets the Precedent
Washington, D.C., offers a glimpse of what Chicago and Baltimore might face, with National Guard troops already a visible presence and protests erupting over the weekend in response.
Some areas of the capital are eerily quiet, while social media videos of arrests are making the rounds. For conservatives, this might look like law and order in action, though critics clearly see it as an overstep. Trump has long criticized major Democratic-run cities, often pointing to what he views as dangerous and poorly managed urban centers.
Many of these cities, including Baltimore, Washington, D.C., and New York, have Black mayors and majority-minority populations, a fact that has drawn accusations of bias from figures like Rev. Al Sharpton, who called it “laced with bigotry.” While policy disagreements are fair game, conservatives might counter that crime stats, not demographics, are driving Trump’s focus.
Governor Moore, via a spokesperson, urged Trump to visit Baltimore and ditch the “1980s scare tactics” for real engagement. “The President should join us in Baltimore because the blissful ignorance… benefits no one,” the statement read.
Yet, from a right-leaning lens, Trump’s supporters might see his troop deployments as the kind of tough love cities need, not just another握handshake tour.
The back-and-forth between Trump and Moore got personal on Sunday, with each questioning the other’s military record—Moore’s past application error versus Trump’s Vietnam draft history.
It’s a mudslinging match that risks overshadowing the real issue: how to tackle urban crime without trampling state autonomy. Conservatives might appreciate Trump’s willingness to confront failing policies, even if the rhetoric gets heated.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Sophia Turner
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://patriotmomdigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
