President Donald Trump has unleashed a fiery critique against two major news networks, calling their coverage a blight on fair journalism.
In late-night commentary on Sunday, Trump targeted NBC and ABC News, accusing them of overwhelming bias and suggesting the Federal Communications Commission should strip their licenses, as Fox News reports.
Trump didn’t hold back, branding these outlets as “FAKE NEWS” and claiming they rank among the most prejudiced networks worldwide. Well, if the shoe fits, it’s hard to argue with a label that sticks. Perhaps it’s time for some self-reflection in the newsrooms.
Trump’s alleges media bias
He asserted that a staggering 97% of the outlets’ stories about him are negative, though where this number comes from remains a mystery. A study by the conservative Media Research Center did note 92% negative coverage during his first 100 days in office. That’s a tough scoreboard to ignore, even if the math isn’t fully transparent.
Trump went as far as to suggest these networks act as an extension of the Democratic Party. “IF THAT IS THE CASE, THEY ARE SIMPLY AN ARM OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY,” he declared. If true, that’s a cozy relationship that raises eyebrows about journalistic integrity.
He doubled down, stating he’s “totally in favor” of pulling their licenses due to their alleged dishonesty and threat to democratic values. That’s a bold stance, even for a leader known for shaking up the status quo. One wonders if the First Amendment would have something to say about this.
License revocation debate heats up
Trump also questioned why NBC and ABC aren’t shelling out millions annually for using public airwaves. “They should pay up BIG for having the privilege,” he insisted. It’s a fair point to ponder—shouldn’t valuable resources come with a hefty price tag?
Yet, the reality is more complex: these national networks don’t hold FCC licenses for news content; their local affiliates do. Those affiliates pay fees based on market size and station type, while Congress alone controls such revenue for the U.S. Treasury. So, Trump’s proposal might hit a bureaucratic wall before it even starts.
Legal experts would likely argue that revoking licenses over perceived bias treads dangerously close to violating free speech protections. Past attempts to punish the media for content have been slapped down by courts. Turns out, the Constitution isn’t just a suggestion.
Trump’s long history with media clashes
This isn’t Trump’s first rodeo with broadcast media — he’s been sparring with them for years. He previously settled a defamation lawsuit against ABC for $15 million, a reminder that legal battles can cut both ways. And let’s not forget his pre-political days hosting “The Apprentice” on NBC, a different kind of spotlight.
More recently, Paramount Global and CBS reached a settlement with Trump over an election interference lawsuit. These clashes paint a picture of a leader unafraid to challenge media giants head-on. It’s a strategy that keeps everyone on their toes.
Trump’s latest call to action includes a demand for consequences, arguing networks should lose licenses for unfair treatment of conservatives or at least face steep fees. “Crooked ‘journalism’ should not be rewarded,” he exclaimed. Hard to disagree that accountability matters, though the execution of such a plan is murky at best.
Media response, legal limits
Fox News Digital has sought comments from ABC and NBC on Trump’s pointed accusations. So far, the silence from these networks is deafening. One can only imagine the internal discussions happening behind closed doors.
While Trump’s frustration with perceived media slant resonates with many who feel the press leans too far into progressive narratives, the legal path to license revocation is a steep climb. Courts have historically protected media from content-based retaliation, and any move by the FCC would likely face swift challenges. It’s a classic case of passion meeting principle — good intentions, but tough sledding.
For now, Trump’s words serve as a rallying cry for those disillusioned with mainstream coverage, even if the practical outcomes remain uncertain. The debate over media fairness isn’t going away anytime soon, and this latest salvo ensures it stays front and center. If nothing else, it’s a reminder that in politics, the pen — and the airwaves — are mightier than ever.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Mae Slater
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.conservativejournalreview.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
