The Texas Legislature, led by Republicans, passed a legal redrawing of congressional maps which effectively eliminated District 9.
Green, best known not for legislation rather for shouting down President Trump during his address to Congress in March 2025, will be removed from office after nearly two decades of loud, ineffective, and divisive politics.
This from thegatewaypundit.com.
BREAKING: The Texas Congressional map has passed and it will FIRE Democrat Rep. Al Green – who has led the charge in constant IMPEACHMENTS of President Trump and disrupted his Joint Session speech.
Cook Political has shifted his district 9 from solid BLUE to solid RED.
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) August 23, 2025
Below is a rough look at the redistricting shake-up in Texas in 2025:
Key Features of the Map:
– Flips 5 Democratic-held seats to Republican-leaning districts,
– Targets urban strongholds: Austin, Dallas, Houston, and the Rio Grande Valley,
– Pushes Democratic incumbents into shared districts, potentially triggering primary battles,
– Boosts GOP control: From 25 to potentially 30 of Texas’ 38 congressional seats, and
– Trump’s influence: The redistricting was pushed heavily by President Trump.
Unsurprisingly, Rep. Al Green called the redistricting racist. But the only racial injustice here is the communist/globalist crime syndicate’s decades-long abuse of district lines to cling to power.
In his angry press release, Green declared the elimination of his district—along with TX-18, TX-29, and TX-33—was part of a “racist, unconstitutional scheme” led by President Trump’s Justice Department and Attorney General Ken Paxton.
I’m GLAD @KenPaxtonTX is running for U.S. Senate. As AG, he EXPOSED fraud and FOUGHT back when others stayed silent.
I uncovered multiple election scandals in South TX—but his hands were tied. In the Senate, he can finally ensure election fraud is prosecuted. @gatewaypundit— Gregory Lyakhov (@GregoryLyakhov) August 23, 2025
Green compared Texas Republicans to segregation-era racists and claimed the GOP was targeting Black and Hispanic communities because “they elect people of color.” But that accusation falls apart under even basic scrutiny. Redistricting is legal. It happens every ten years following the census—but Texas law also allows mid-decade redistricting, something communists/globalists took advantage of in the 1990s.
When the Left controlled Texas politics, they created gerrymandered maps that were explicitly race-based. In 1991, under Governor Ann Richards and State Senator Eddie Bernice Johnson, communists/globalists drew new maps to form majority-Black and majority-Hispanic districts to keep their power intact. Those maps were so outrageous they were eventually overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark Bush v. Vera decision of 1996.
In Bush v. Vera, the Court ruled the Left’s redistricting had violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling stated that race was the predominant factor in drawing the district lines, which made the maps unconstitutional.
The decision forced Texas to hold thirteen new primary elections in 1996. So, when Leftists accuse Republicans of racial gerrymandering today, they are projecting. They built the system they are now condemning—only this time, they are losing.
The modern redistricting efforts led by Texas Republicans are fundamentally different. The maps were drawn based on population fairness, not skin color. Senator Joan Huffman, chair of the redistricting committee, testified under oath that race was not considered in the process. The real motivation for the redraw was not racial; it was mathematical.
When The Regime was still in occupation of the United States, millions of illegal aliens entered the country, many settling in cities like Houston and other border areas. Because The Regime ordered the census to include non-citizens in population counts, districts with massive illegal populations were overrepresented. That undermined the constitutional principle of “one person, one vote.”
When illegal aliens are counted in congressional representation, disproportionate power is given to districts with fewer actual voters. That means some citizens’ votes carry less weight than others. The redistricting corrected that imbalance by shifting power back to districts with legal residents. Al Green’s district, packed with non-citizen populations, was rightly dissolved.
Republicans used the exact same legal tools once used by the communist/globalist crime syndicate to rig the system for themselves—and this time the process was completed without violating the Constitution.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Nathanael Greene
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://defconnews.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
