Letitia James Loses $515 Million Civil Penalty Case Against Trump in Appeals Court

New York Attorney General Letitia James suffered a high-profile defeat Thursday after a state appeals court struck down a $515 million civil fraud penalty she had pursued against President Donald Trump, ruling it unconstitutional and excessive. 

The decision invalidates a portion of James’ 2023 lawsuit that had threatened to dismantle Trump’s property assets.

The five-judge panel of the Appellate Division criticized the scale of the penalty while acknowledging that some restrictions on Trump’s business practices were reasonable. 

“The court’s disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,” wrote Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton.

James’ office had initially sought to impose penalties on Trump and his sons, Eric and Donald Jr., totaling more than $527 million, citing widespread financial misrepresentation. 

The appeals court ruling eliminated those additional fines, although temporary limits on the Trumps holding corporate leadership positions remain paused while further appeals proceed, according to Trending Politics. 

Earlier this year, Trump posted a $175 million bond to block immediate collection.

Trump framed the ruling as a vindication, insisting the case was politically motivated. 

His attorneys highlighted disclaimers in his financial statements noting they were unaudited, pointed to independent evaluations by banks and insurers and emphasized that all loans had been repaid. 

Trump has consistently argued that his reported net worth was “lowball,” not exaggerated.

The nearly 11-month delay in issuing the appellate decision has drawn criticism from some observers who say it underscores concerns about political influence in high-profile cases. James did not issue an immediate statement following the ruling.

The setback comes amid a series of legal challenges facing James herself, including allegations of mortgage fraud and other investigations questioning her handling of public funds. 

Critics argue the appeals court decision compounds scrutiny on her office, highlighting the difficulty of pursuing massive civil penalties while under personal and professional legal pressure. 

Some analysts suggest this combination of high-profile losses and ongoing investigations could tarnish her reputation and limit her effectiveness in future cases.

The ruling marks another cautionary moment in James’ tenure as New York’s top legal official. 

While she has characterized the lawsuit against Trump as an effort to protect New Yorkers from financial misconduct, the appellate decision temporarily lifts the severe financial burden she sought to impose, leaving the door open for further review by New York’s highest court.

Legal analysts note that the combination of setbacks in high-profile cases and mounting personal legal woes could affect James’ credibility and strategy going forward. 

The decision also underscores the challenge state attorneys general face when taking on politically and financially powerful figures, with scrutiny intensified by the ongoing legal battles surrounding the Trump Organization.

For James, Thursday’s ruling serves as both a professional and strategic setback, underscoring the risks of pursuing aggressive legal action while facing her own mounting controversies. 

Observers predict her office will now face increased pressure to demonstrate accountability and recalibrate its approach to major civil cases in New York.

WATCH:

The post Letitia James Loses $515 Million Civil Penalty Case Against Trump in Appeals Court appeared first on Resist the Mainstream.