DOJ PROBES Biden’s Autopen Use!!?

A new investigation questions the authorization of former President Biden’s pardons, raising issues regarding presidential authority and transparency.

Story Highlights

• House Oversight Committee probes authorization of former President Biden’s pardons.
• DOJ reportedly examining autopen use and questions of Biden’s competency.
• Comer expands investigation, questioning former Biden aides.
• Partisan media suggests pardons could be overturned; mainstream sources do not substantiate this claim.

Comer’s Investigation into Biden Pardons

House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer is leading an investigation into the authorization of pardons issued by former President Joe Biden. The inquiry focuses on whether these pardons and other executive actions were authorized using an autopen or by staff during a period when Biden’s cognitive fitness was questioned. If unauthorized, these actions could raise constitutional and federal practice concerns. The investigation has expanded to include questioning former senior aides from the Biden administration.

The investigation has drawn attention, with the Department of Justice reportedly examining similar issues. The DOJ’s probe is said to explore whether the use of an autopen was appropriate and if Biden was competent when the pardons were issued. The findings could influence how presidential authority is exercised and verified, particularly concerning the use of mechanical signatures for official acts.

James Comer Comment Suggests Biden Pardons Were Illegal – Evidence His Committee Is Gathering Could Overturn via @WestJournalism https://t.co/iRcB70DDrr

— Chris Scott maricopa county (@ChrissyScott777) August 12, 2025

Media Framing and Partisan Perspectives

Various media outlets have framed the investigation differently. Some partisan media, such as The Western Journal, have suggested that the committee’s findings could lead to the overturning of Biden’s pardons. This claim has not been substantiated by mainstream sources, which have reported that legal scholars agree there is no constitutional mechanism to overturn a pardon once it is granted. This discrepancy highlights the role of media framing in shaping public perception and political discourse.

Comer, along with other Republican officials, has argued that the pardons raise significant ethical and legal questions. He has contended that these actions may indicate an abuse of power. Meanwhile, some Democratic members of the committee view the investigation as politically motivated and unlikely to yield substantive results.

Potential Implications and Future Developments

As the investigation progresses, its outcomes could influence future presidential practices regarding the authorization and issuance of pardons. If unauthorized actions are confirmed, this may prompt legal reforms and stricter oversight mechanisms to ensure the President personally authorizes such acts. The inquiry might also impact public opinion and the political landscape, intensifying debates over presidential capacity and the delegation of authority.

While the investigation continues, its long-term effects remain uncertain. The Oversight Committee’s findings and the DOJ’s conclusions will be crucial in determining any legal or procedural changes. The case underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in governmental processes and the ongoing scrutiny of presidential powers.

Sources:

Fox News: Exclusive Comer Hails DOJ’s Biden Probe as House Investigation Heats Up
Oversight Committee Blog: Comer on Fox News – Biden Crime Family Pardons Serve as a Confession of Their Corruption
House Oversight: Chairman Comer Expands Investigation into Biden Mental Decline Cover-Up
ABC News: Former Aide Tanden Appears Before House Committee Investigating Biden’s Pardons