A newly released report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), now led by Tulsi Gabbard, has reignited debate in Washington by challenging the origins of the 2016 Russia investigation.
At a Glance
- The ODNI report alleges that senior Obama-era intelligence officials manipulated assessments of Russian election interference.
- Former President Trump has accused Obama of treason and demanded criminal action.
- Obama’s team has rejected the claims as “outrageous” and reaffirmed bipartisan findings of no vote manipulation.
- The DOJ has confirmed receiving a criminal referral but has not announced plans for investigation.
- Former FBI Director Kash Patel is reportedly reviewing aspects of the case involving former intelligence officials.
High-Stakes Allegations and Institutional Reactions
Director Gabbard claims the ODNI has evidence that officials such as James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice—and possibly President Obama—crafted an alternate narrative about Russian interference, diverging from prior intelligence community consensus. The report reopens questions previously addressed by the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, the Mueller Report, and the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee—all of which found interference by Russia but no criminal conspiracy with Trump’s campaign.
Watch a report: Gabbard alleges Obama manufactured intel on Russian interference – YouTube
Responses and Political Reverberations
Trump immediately seized on the report, calling it evidence of treason and asserting that Obama-era officials should face criminal charges. His use of an AI-generated video depicting Obama’s arrest underlines the intensity of his rhetoric.
In contrast, Obama’s spokesperson labeled the allegations “ridiculous” and reaffirmed long-standing bipartisan conclusions that Russia disrupted the 2016 election—but did not alter vote counts. Critics of the ODNI report suggest it may be politically motivated and lacks new substantive evidence.
Legal Implications and Institutional Stakes
The DOJ’s receipt of a criminal referral places it at a crossroads. If it moves forward with an investigation into former intelligence leaders, including Brennan and Comey, it could open a major legal inquiry into the politicization of intelligence. Alternatively, a decision not to act could fuel accusations of partisan influence, particularly as FBI Director Kash Patel continues to probe prior officials.
National Trust in the Balance
This report and the DOJ’s next steps may deepen partisan divides and influence how future intelligence reviews are conducted. With the fall political cycle approaching, both sides are likely to use the outcome—whether investigation or dismissal—to bolster their narratives on government accountability and national security.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editor
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://deepstatetribunal.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.