Another judicial showdown is brewing over immigration enforcement in Southern California.
The Detroit Catholic reported that a federal judge in Los Angeles has thrown a wrench into the Trump administration’s immigration policies, ruling against enforcement actions based purely on race or language use, while the administration gears up to fight back with an appeal, claiming such decisions belong to Congress and the president.
Let’s rewind to early July, when the bishop of San Bernardino made a striking move. On July 8, 2025, a first-of-its-kind dispensation was issued, excusing the faithful from Sunday Mass if they feared ICE operations.
It was an absurd gesture that further stoked fears, without evidence, that federal immigration officials are scooping up and deporting American citizens by the thousands with no oversight.
Judge’s Ruling Sparks Controversy in California
Just days later, on July 11, 2025, U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong dropped a bombshell ruling. Immigration officers in Southern California are now barred from detaining individuals based solely on race, ethnicity, or even speaking Spanish.
The order demands “reasonable suspicion” of an immigration violation before any stop is made. This isn’t just a suggestion—it’s a hard line.
The judge explicitly banned suspicion based on accents, workplace type, or simply being at places like bus stops or day laborer sites. No more “roving patrols” targeting specific locations, which many see as a direct jab at ICE’s playbook.
But the Trump administration isn’t taking this lying down. They’ve announced plans to appeal, arguing that federal judges shouldn’t be meddling in immigration policy. It’s a classic clash of branches, and the stakes couldn’t be higher.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson didn’t mince words on the matter. “No federal judge has the authority to dictate immigration policy—that authority rests with Congress and the president,” she declared. If that’s not a polite but firm slap at judicial overreach, what is?
Jackson went further, calling the ruling a “gross overstep” of judicial power. “Enforcement operations require careful planning and execution; skills far beyond the purview or jurisdiction of any judge,” she added.
It’s a sharp reminder that policy-making isn’t a courtroom game, though one wonders if this appeal will just drag out the inevitable.
Meanwhile, Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, stirred the pot with comments on Fox News about using “physical appearance” as a detention factor. He later backtracked on CNN, clarifying his stance. It’s a messy soundbite in an already heated debate.
Homan Clarifies Stance Amid Backlash
Homan was quick to set the record straight. “I want to be clear because my words were taken out of context,” he insisted.
“Physical description cannot be the sole reason to detain and question somebody,” Homan continued. “It’s a myriad of factors.” That’s a fair correction, but skeptics might argue it’s damage control after the initial slip.
On the other side, Catholic immigration advocates are sounding alarms over ICE’s tactics in Southern California. A joint report from Christian organizations in 2025 revealed that 80% of those targeted in the administration’s massive deportation push are Christian, with 61% of the 10 million at risk being Catholic. It’s a statistic that hits hard, especially for communities of faith.
Adding fuel to the fire, media outlets have highlighted a troubling uptick in U.S. citizens being detained during this deportation surge.
A 2021 Government Accountability Office report even noted that ICE may have wrongly deported 70 American citizens between 2015 and 2020. That’s not just a clerical error—it’s a policy failure that demands scrutiny.
Critics like J. Kevin Appleby from the Center for Migration Studies aren’t holding back. “Sadly, we are at a point in our country where racial profiling is being used openly to target people without probable cause,” he lamented.
While his concern is valid, one might argue that enforcement isn’t profiling if grounded in broader, legitimate factors, though the line seems razor-thin here.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Sophia Turner
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://patriotmomdigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.