The news has been filled in recent months with instances of federal judges delivering attacks on the administration of President Donald Trump, releasing rulings that take control of Executive Branch decisions, restrict Trump’s programs to secure the border and remove illegal alien criminals from U.S. shores.
Those cases have involved cutting federal spending, removing illegal aliens, eliminating destructive DEI programs, protecting children from transgender ideologies, and mutilations, stopping anti-Semitism and much more.
There has been the appearance of bias in the judiciary.
And now there’s confirmation of that very bias from none other than the judiciary itself.
It is in a report at the Federalist that investigative reporter and senior legal correspondent Margot Cleveland reveals James Boasberg, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., advised Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts that his colleagues were “concern[ed] that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis.”
Boasberg is the chief judge in the judicial district and has been at center of a judicial campaign to prevent Trump’s agenda to secure the American borders and deport illegal aliens, those who are in the United States illegally, and often have committed subsequent crimes.
Further, Boasberg also was at the center of activism before President Trump’s first term when he was under attack in the fabricated Russiagate conspiracy theory launched by the Hillary Clinton campaign and others with lies about Trump campaign collusion with Russia.
Boasberg was chosen for his job by leftist Barack Obama, who now is just one subject of a congressional investigation into a vast conspiracy that developed in Washington targeting Trump.
Boasberg, in fact, when sentencing an ex-FBI lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, who admitted doctoring a 2017 email regarding Deep State’s work against Trump, refused to give him any prison time but told him to do community service.
Boasberg ruled against Trump in one deportation dispute and told him to order airplanes carrying illegal aliens out of the United States to turn around mid-air and come back.
The White House responded that the jets, carrying the “terrorist alien” individuals, already had left U.S. airspace and the judge had no jurisdiction there.
Federal judges already have heard hundreds of claims by those wanting to stop Trump’s agenda to remove unneeded personnel from federal payrolls, stop handing billions of tax dollars to unfriendly foreign interests and more.
As a result of the campaign by district judges to target Trump’s actions, the Supreme Court intervened and said they were misusing their offices by repeatedly ordering nationwide injunctions against Trump’s agenda. The court said those judges haven’t been granted the constitutional authority to do that.
The Federalist reported it obtained access to a memo from a recent Judicial Conference meeting in Washington.
That group is the national policymaking body for federal courts.
WOW: D.C. judges admit illegal bias
“Boasberg, lacking jurisdiction as SCOTUS later confirmed, gave a lawless order commanding the Trump Admin to halt removals to El Salvador. So, a judge concerned about Trump following the law, ignored the law”
Max hypocrisy. Defund DC courts! https://t.co/twb4A2DBGf pic.twitter.com/mdBj0a2EJU
— John Strand (@JohnStrandUSA) July 16, 2025
It appears DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg plotted a constitutional crisis against President Trump just days before Boasberg illegally and dangerously exposed a military operation to expel terrorists.https://t.co/018vZyZNl0
— Mike Davis (@mrddmia) July 16, 2025
If true, there is a plausible claim Chief Judge Boasberg violated Canon 2A of the Codes of Conduct by speaking publicly about a litigant with pending litigation before him. He should recuse from all Trump administration cases and I anticipate a judicial misconduct complaint to be…
— Rob Luther (@RobLutherLawyer) July 16, 2025
Not sure what other evidence House GOP needs to start an impeachment inquiry into DC chief Judge Jeb Boasberg.
A few days before his infamous “turn the planes around stunt,” Boasberg told Chief Justice John Roberts at a judicial conference breakfast that his DC colleagues were…
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) July 16, 2025
“That Judge Boasberg and his fellow D.C. District Court judges would discuss how a named Defendant in numerous pending lawsuits might respond to an adverse ruling is shocking. Equally outrageous is those judges’ clear disregard for the presumption of regularity — a presumption that requires a court to presume public officials properly discharged their official duties,” the Federalist reported.
At the meeting, the report said, “a side conversation at the group’s most recent meeting revealed a disturbing detail — the predisposition of supposedly unbiased judges against the Trump Administration.”
The memo explained, “District of the District of Columbia Chief Judge James Boasberg next raised his colleagues’ concerns that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis.”
The Federalist noted the memo continued, “Chief Justice Roberts expressed hope that would not happen and in turn no constitutional crisis would materialize.”
The report pointed out, “Donald Trump, however, is not merely the president: He is a Defendant in scores of lawsuits, including multiple cases in the D.C. District Court. As such, this conversation did not concern generic concerns of the judiciary, but specific discussions about a litigant currently before the same judges who expressed concern to the Chief Judge of the D.C. District Court that the Trump Administration would disregard the court’s orders.”
The report noted, “Judge Boasberg’s comments reveal he and his colleagues hold an anti-Trump bias, for the Trump Administration had complied with every court order to date (and since for that matter). The D.C. District Court judges’ ‘concern’ also went counter to the normal presumption courts hold — one that presumes public officials properly discharged their official duties. Apparently, that presumption does not apply to the current president, at least if you are litigating in D.C.”
The Federalist noted just days later, “Boasberg, in a case in which he completely lacked jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court would later confirm, entered a lawless order commanding the Trump Administration to halt removals to El Salvador. So, one of the judges concerned about Trump following the law, ignored the law.”
He went even further in his agenda, the report said: “Boasberg would later find ‘the Trump Administration committed criminal contempt of court’ by failing to turn the planes around or fly the gang members back to the U.S., even though the court’s written (and unlawful) injunction ordered neither.”
Cleveland explained that Boasberg and his colleague “prejudged Trump as a scofflaw,” even though that’s not the case.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Bob Unruh
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.wnd.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
