In the final hours of his presidency, Joe Biden reportedly authorized a wave of controversial preemptive pardons, with critics suggesting the move may have been carried out without his full awareness or direct involvement.
Concerns have mounted over the use of an autopen device, an automated signature tool that was said to have been employed to sign off on thousands of pardon documents. President Donald Trump and many within the Republican Party have argued that the device may have been used as a means to bypass Biden’s direct review, raising broader questions about who was effectively managing the executive branch.
According to records reviewed by the New York Times, former White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients is believed to have given the final authorization for several high-profile pardons, including those granted to Dr. Anthony Fauci and General Mark Milley. These actions were described as efforts to shield key allies from future accountability, particularly under a Trump-led administration.
According to internal communications, President Biden is said to have met with his advisers on the evening of January 19—just before the close of his term—to go over clemency guidelines. By 10:28 p.m., a summary of the meeting’s conclusions had reportedly been shared with top staff. Shortly after, Zients appeared to give the green light for the autopen to be used in signing the necessary documents.
Although it was claimed that Biden had approved general pardon criteria, the Times noted he did not personally review or approve each case. This admission has intensified scrutiny, as it suggests executive powers may have been exercised by unelected aides, bypassing traditional checks.
When asked about the situation, President Trump voiced serious concerns and called it a possibly historic scandal. The number and timing of the pardons, more than 4,200 were given during Biden’s term, with the great bulk occurring in the last few months, have raised concerns that they might be an attempt to solidify policy choices or protect associates before the inauguration of a Republican administration.
Conservative critics have described the acts as a component of the Biden administration’s larger pattern of deceit. A Trump White House spokeswoman claimed that the American public had been misinformed about Biden’s physical and mental health for years and characterized the incident as part of a broader cover-up.
More pressure was applied after President Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to begin a probe into the matter. The memo specifically called for an examination of whether the autopen was required due to Biden’s cognitive deterioration.
Long-standing concerns about the actual nature of decision-making under the Biden administration are heightened by this occurrence. Many have persisted in doubting whether he was exercising active governance or if executive authority had been properly transferred to employees working in the background.
It was also reported that President Trump refrains from using automated signatures for any legally binding government documents, relying instead on his signature. Although Trump has previously acknowledged using an autopen for non-legal correspondence, key legal orders are reportedly personally signed.
With mounting questions surrounding the integrity of Biden’s final acts as president, calls for transparency and accountability are expected to grow louder in the weeks ahead.
The post Joe Biden’s Autopen Author Finally Revealed After Emails LEAK appeared first on Boveed.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author:
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://boveed.info and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.