WATCH: Famed lawyer Alan Dershowitz delivers firsthand testimony about Epstein documents

Amid the fights developing over what Jeffrey Epstein did, or didn’t do, and the documents and information the government has, or doesn’t have, regarding his pedophilia and his acquaintances, there comes a high-profile personality with firsthand experience.

Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz, a longtime leftist who was swept up in allegations that erupted from the Epstein scenario, his activities and his controversies, found himself accused.

Falsely.

Here is his assessment of what’s going on, with the DOJ’s statement that no more information likely will be released about Epstein, the claim he did commit suicide in jail while awaiting additional charges, and the charge that there is no scandalous “client” list of his acquaintances.

There has been no explanation from the Trump administration about why that information first was discussed for release, then abruptly shut down.

WATCH:

He said:

This is not an opinion. This is a fact. I have seen … remember I was accused falsely and …. ultimately I was completely cleared … the woman admitted she may have mistook me for somebody else and withdrew all of her lawsuits, and so from Day One, from the day I was accused, I said I want every document, because I knew every document would prove that I was innocent.

So let me tell you I know for a fact documents are being suppressed, and they’re being suppressed to protect individuals. I know the names of the individuals. I know why they’re being suppressed. I know who’s suppressing them, but I’m bound by confidentiality from a judge and cases and I can’t disclose what I know. But I, hand to God, I know, I know the names of people, whose files are being suppressed, in order to protect them.

They’re everything, uh, look, let me tell you, a lot of them, at least one of them is somebody who was accused. Others are accusers. The judge said if somebody calls themselves a victim, a victim, we’re not going to give any information about them. But they may not be victims, they may be perpetrators so we don’t have information about false accusers. And we know there have been many false accusers who have accused innocent people for money, and those records are being deliberately, willfully suppressed and they shouldn’t be suppressed.

If the accusation is allowed out, so should the material that diminishes the credibility of the accusers. We want total transparency on this. Every single document. No redactions, that’s what I said from day one. I waive any of my rights to privacy, anything there is about me I’m happy it will be exculpatory because I know I haven’t touched a woman other than my wife from the day I met Jeffrey Epstein. I don’t even hug people.

But I was falsely accused. But I was able to prove it and I was able to prove it through documents and I want other people to be able to disprove false accusations through documents. But these documents are being suppressed and withheld.”

Commentator and author Victor Davis Hanson has a similar take on the protection of certain individuals connected to Epstein. Here is the explanation he recently gave to Glenn Beck:

WATCH: Victor Davis Hanson drops what might be the clearest, most damning explanation yet for Epstein’s real role…..and why those files still aren’t public.

Victor Davis Hanson has a gift for cutting through the noise.

In this conversation with @glennbeck, he laid out… pic.twitter.com/A1hlZWwcva

— The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) July 10, 2025