📹 Watch Chuck Norris’ Shocking Health Secret
➡️ http://ChuckDefense.com/Next
Discover How He Reversed the Clock at 84!
🛍️ Gear Up with Exclusive Next News Merch! 🛍️
➡️ http://shop.NextNewsNetwork.com
Don’t miss out on our limited edition merch—grab yours now!
The nuclear threats are real, and they’re on tape. In this explosive segment from the Next News Network’s RAW FEED, Gary Franchi reveals the most shocking presidential audio leak in American history. Donald Trump, speaking at a private fundraiser, admitted he threatened to "bomb the sh*t out of Moscow" if Putin invaded Ukraine – and made the same threat to Xi Jinping about Beijing if China moved on Taiwan.
This isn’t campaign rhetoric or public posturing. This is Trump behind closed doors with his biggest donors, revealing exactly how he wielded the madman theory against two nuclear superpowers. "Putin didn’t believe me," Trump explained on the recording, "except 10%. And 10% is all you need." The same calculation with Xi: "He thought I was crazy… but he believed me 10%."
The timing of this leak couldn’t be worse. Just hours after the audio surfaced, Putin launched his largest drone assault on Ukraine yet, while NATO scrambled fighter jets across Europe. The Kremlin’s response was swift and brutal – both militarily and verbally. Putin himself delivered a chilling assessment: "They come and go, but politics stay the same… people with briefcases arrive… and instantly everything changes."
The betrayal runs deep. Someone at that high-dollar fundraiser – where phones are locked in Faraday bags and recording is strictly forbidden – smuggled in a device and captured Trump’s most sensitive revelations. This wasn’t just any donor event; these gatherings require surrendering all electronics precisely to prevent such leaks. Yet someone risked everything to expose these nuclear threats.
Mike Pompeo rushed to provide context, reminding America that Trump was the first president to send defensive weapons to Ukraine – not Obama, not Biden initially. "It’s in America’s interest that Putin not win this war," Pompeo declared, noting Putin hasn’t been acting in good faith. But the contradiction is stark: Trump simultaneously criticizes Biden’s "blank check" to Ukraine while boasting about threatening to obliterate Moscow.
The fundraiser audio, obtained by Wall Street Journal’s Josh Dawsey, Washington Post’s Isaac Arnsdorf, and others for their new book "2024: How Trump Retook the White House," reveals Trump’s frustration with Putin: "He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless." This from the man who promised he could end the war in 24 hours.
This revelation demands your attention and action. We’re witnessing either brilliant strategic ambiguity or dangerous brinksmanship with nuclear powers.
Support the independent journalism that brings you these crucial stories. The mainstream media spins; we deliver raw truth.
Donate at https://www.givesendgo.com/Keep-Next-News-Alive or via PayPal at https://www.paypal.com/donate?campaign_id=BAC78BHT6NPU6. Become a member at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLoNQH9RCndfUGOb2f7E1Ew/join for exclusive analysis of these world-changing developments.
Russian media is already weaponizing this leak. Blue Georgia’s Julie Roginsky, speaking on CNN, revealed the Russian term for Trump: "полезный дурачок" – useful idiot. She warned that Putin "cannot afford to lose this war" because like the Tsars before him, losing face means regime collapse. Trump’s nuclear threats may have just cornered a desperate autocrat with 6,000 nuclear warheads.
The president’s own words from yesterday’s cabinet meeting show his evolving position: "Putin is not treating human beings right. He’s killing too many people. So we’re sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine." But defensive weapons are one thing – threatening to bomb capitals is another level entirely.
Gary Franchi poses the critical question: Is this peace through strength or warmongering madness? Trump’s "madman theory" worked during his first term – no new wars, no invasions. But now, with the threats public and Putin responding with massive military escalation, has the strategy backfired? When you threaten to bomb Moscow and Beijing, and your enemies know you said it, does the 10% calculation still work?
The implications are staggering. If world leaders only need to believe there’s a 10% chance Trump would actually bomb their capitals, what happens when they test that percentage? We’re watching that calculation play out in real-time as Putin escalates rather than negotiates, launching the largest drone assault while Trump expresses frustration that his threats no longer carry weight.
Catch the whole RAW FEED live stream at https://youtu.be/C8xImiQQ0FU
