Graphene Healthcare and Electromagnetic Warfare

Introduction by Dee McLachlan

I was alerted to a Substack post entitled “Sabrina Wallace, the Global Information Grid, and Electromagnetic Warfare.” The log line:

“Biodigital Convergence, “Healthcare,” Human Bodies as Nodes on a Control Grid, Surveillance, Bio-cyber Interfaces, Intrabody Communication, “Security,” the GIG, Network-centric Warfare, and Eugenics.”

This led me to Google “Graphene Healthcare“. The AI overview at the top of the page:

“Graphene, with its unique properties, holds significant promise for revolutionizing healthcare. Its high surface area, conductivity, and mechanical strength make it ideal for drug delivery, biosensors, and tissue engineering. Graphene-based materials are being explored for diagnostics, therapeutics, and regenerative medicine, with ongoing research focusing on biocompatibility and potential toxicity.”

Oh, what was found in those jabs that they didn’t tell us about?

The Graphene Council was at the top of the search:

How Can Graphene be Used in Healthcare?

“Nanomaterials now have a fairly long and established commercial role in life sciences and biomedicine. Perhaps most notably, and successfully, in drug delivery applications, which now represent a multi-million-dollar market. While graphene may be the new kid on the block, it does have some superior properties and characteristics to its nanomaterial cousins… By adding some biomolecules to graphene, you can dramatically expand the number of applications for which it can be used.”

Sabrina Wallace’s Post

She shared David A Hughes’ post:

“Many thanks to Sabrina Wallace for engaging with my research and finding synergies with her own in the video above. Wallace and I appear to have certain things in common:

the belief that a nefarious agenda is being followed to hook human bodies up to an external control network;
willingness to examine primary source material that otherwise hides in plain sight because people have been primed to look in the wrong places. Wallace seems particularly strong on IEEE documentation;
a sense of historical consciousness; and
condemnation of the professions that, through their cowardice and complicity, have helped to facilitate the building of a biodigital slavery system.

“I was particularly interested in Wallace’s discussion of literature that I had not previously encountered…

“Biodigital Convergence

“I have previously shown that the planning for the “IT/Bio/Nano” era — essentially, connecting human bodies to an external control network — goes at least as far back as the early 2000s in literature by NASA, the National Science Foundation, the RAND Corporation, and other non-healthcare-related organisations (Hughes, 2024a, pp. 337-338). In that context, it is interesting that Wallace shows the following diagram from the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC):”

TO CONTINUE READING THE ARTICLE (AND VIDEO)

Hughes also goes into Electronic Warfare: “As Wallace rightly notes, intra-body communication technologies must be seen in the context of the decades-long history of electromagnetic warfare (more commonly known as electronic warfare), which is defined by the U.S. Department of Defence as “any military action involving the use of electromagnetic and directed energy to control the electromagnetic spectrum or to attack the enemy”.”

Sabrina Wallace video (published 8 month ago)