Actor John Cusack urges Iran to build nuclear weapons

John Cusack’s latest Hollywood hot take is a dangerous call for Iran to arm itself with nuclear weapons. The actor’s reckless endorsement of Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, posted amid a fragile ceasefire, ignores the catastrophic risks of escalating tensions in an already volatile Middle East.

President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire Monday, halting the “12-Day War” between Israel and Iran after U.S. strikes crippled Tehran’s nuclear program.

American B-2 Spirit bombers, flying 37-hour missions from Missouri, dropped a 15-ton Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb on Iran’s Fordow facility, alongside strikes on Isfahan and Natanz. Intelligence reports confirm Iran’s nuclear capabilities are now set back by years.

Breitbart reported that Cusack’s claim that Iran “should get” a nuclear weapon to deter U.S. and Israeli actions is as naive as it is inflammatory.

His logic assumes a rogue regime, notorious for sponsoring terrorism, would wield such power responsibly. This is the kind of Hollywood elitism that mistakes geopolitics for a movie script.

U.S. Strikes Devastate Iranian Facilities

The U.S. military’s precision strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites were a masterclass in decisive action. The Fordow facility, buried deep underground, required the world’s largest non-nuclear bomb to neutralize its threat. Tehran’s dreams of nuclear dominance are now in rubble, thanks to American resolve.

Israel, a key ally, provided critical intelligence to support the operation. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu detailed a timeline of events, revealing Iran’s bad faith even before the ceasefire. His account exposes Tehran’s aggression, undermining Cusack’s rosy view of their intentions.

Iran’s response was predictable but telling. Shortly before the ceasefire took effect, Tehran launched a missile barrage that killed four Israeli citizens, per Netanyahu. This blatant provocation shows Iran’s disregard for peace and makes Cusack’s nuclear cheerleading all the more absurd.

The ceasefire, meant to cool tensions, was violated by both sides, Trump noted. Iran fired three additional missiles after the agreement, further destabilizing the region. Such actions prove Tehran cannot be trusted, least of all with the world’s most destructive weapons.

Israel didn’t sit idly by. The Israeli Air Force swiftly destroyed a radar installation near Tehran in retaliation for Iran’s post-ceasefire missile launches. This measured response underscores Israel’s commitment to self-defense, a reality Cusack conveniently ignores.

Cusack’s assertion that a nuclear Iran would “deter” U.S. and Israeli bombing is pure fantasy. A nuclear-armed Iran would embolden its proxies, threaten global energy supplies, and spark an arms race across the Middle East. His simplistic take betrays a stunning ignorance of strategic realities.

Hollywood’s Misguided Moralizing

Why does Cusack think Iran’s nuclear pursuit is a noble cause? His framing of the U.S. and Israel as reckless aggressors flips the script on decades of Iranian hostility. This is woke Hollywood’s playbook: vilify the West while excusing authoritarian regimes.

The “12-Day War” began with Iran’s nuclear ambitions threatening global stability. The U.S. and Israel acted to prevent a catastrophe, not to bully a helpless nation. Cusack’s narrative distorts this truth, casting Tehran as the victim.

Netanyahu’s report of four Israeli deaths from Iran’s pre-ceasefire missile barrage deserves more attention than Cusack’s tweet. Real lives were lost, yet the actor’s focus is on empowering the aggressor. This disconnect reveals the moral bankruptcy of his position.

Conservatives understand that appeasing Iran is a fool’s errand. The regime’s missile launches, both before and after the ceasefire, confirm its unreliability as a partner for peace. Cusack’s call for a nuclear Iran is not just misguided—it’s a recipe for disaster.

Trump’s ceasefire, though imperfect, aimed to de-escalate a crisis sparked by Iran’s aggression. The U.S. strikes were a necessary evil to protect global security, not an imperialist power grab. Cusack’s anti-American rhetoric misses this critical context.