The Trump White House just pulled the curtain back on Joe Biden’s inner circle, stripping away their legal shield. By waiving executive privilege for former Biden aides, President Trump has given House Republicans a green light to dig into allegations of a cover-up surrounding Biden’s mental decline. This move signals a no-holds-barred probe that could shake up the political landscape.
The House Oversight Committee, led by Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., is spearheading an investigation into whether senior Biden aides hid the former president’s cognitive struggles from the public and White House staff. Letters obtained by Fox News Digital confirm that the Trump administration is refusing to let these aides dodge scrutiny by claiming privilege. It’s a bold step that promises answers but risks escalating partisan tensions.
Deputy Counsel to the President Gary Lawkowski sent pointed letters to a who’s-who of Biden’s former team, including ex-Chief of Staff Ron Klain and senior advisors like Anita Dunn and Steve Ricchetti. These letters make it clear: Trump sees no national interest in protecting their silence. The message is blunt—testify or face the consequences.
Privilege Waived, Questions Loom
Lawkowski’s letters didn’t mince words, stating that executive privilege “is not justified” for the Oversight Committee’s probe into Biden’s fitness for office. The investigation is zeroing in on what these aides knew about Biden’s mental acuity and who was really pulling the strings in his administration. It’s a question that cuts to the heart of trust in government.
The probe is also examining whether aides deliberately kept concerns about Biden’s health under wraps, misleading both the public and lower-level staff. Comer’s team is leaving no stone unturned, demanding to know if executive powers were misused or delegated in secret. This isn’t just about Biden—it’s about accountability at the highest levels.
Notably, the Biden administration itself set a precedent by waiving privilege for records during the January 6 Capitol attack investigation. They even rejected privilege claims by figures like Peter Navarro and Michael Flynn. Now, the tables have turned, and Biden’s former aides are caught in a similar bind.
First Testimony Raises Eyebrows
The Oversight Committee wasted no time, kicking off its probe with a closed-door interview of Neera Tanden, Biden’s former staff secretary, on Tuesday. The Trump White House waived privilege for her deposition, ensuring she couldn’t hide behind legal protections. Tanden’s testimony is the first crack in what could be a dam of revelations.
Tanden, who had limited direct contact with Biden, told investigators she sent decision memos to his inner circle for autopen signatures. She claimed ignorance of what happened between sending and receiving those memos, raising questions about who was actually in charge. Her role may have been minor, but her testimony sets the stage for bigger players.
After her hourslong deposition, Tanden told reporters, “There was absolutely not” any effort to disguise Biden’s mental state. That’s a convenient denial, but it’s hard to believe a staff secretary was completely in the dark. Her insistence that no cover-up existed feels like a deflection that won’t hold up under scrutiny.
More Aides in the Hot Seat
Tanden wasn’t the only one called to testify—an aide to former first lady Jill Biden, Anthony Bernal, is slated to face Comer’s team on Thursday. The committee is clearly moving fast, signaling they mean business. Bernal’s testimony could shed light on the inner workings of Biden’s closest confidants.
The letters from Lawkowski also targeted other heavyweights like Bruce Reed, Ashley Williams, and Mike Donilon, all of whom served in critical roles. The Oversight Committee wants to know if they assessed Biden’s fitness and whether they saw red flags that were swept under the rug. These are the kinds of questions that demand straight answers, not political spin.
It’s unclear whether these aides planned to invoke executive privilege in the first place, but Trump’s decision to waive it has stripped them of that option. This move forces them to face the music without a legal crutch. It’s a calculated risk that could expose uncomfortable truths or fuel accusations of a partisan witch hunt.
What’s at Stake for Accountability
Both Republicans and the White House are circling the same question: Did Biden’s team mislead the nation about his ability to lead? The investigation’s focus on who exercised executive powers during Biden’s tenure suggests a deeper concern about unelected officials running the show. That’s a scenario no American, left or right, should be comfortable with.
Tanden’s claim that she “answered every question” and was “pleased to discuss” her service sounds noble, but it sidesteps the core issue. If senior aides were unaware of or ignored Biden’s decline, that’s a failure of leadership. If they hid it, that’s a betrayal of public trust.
As Comer’s probe ramps up, the nation is watching to see if this investigation delivers clarity or devolves into political theater. The waiver of executive privilege is a game-changer, ensuring that Biden’s former aides can’t hide behind closed doors. For a country craving transparency, this could be a step toward truth—or a spark for more division.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Benjamin Clark
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://americandigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
