A recent study published in BMC Public Health, titled “Does mask usage correlate with excess mortality? Findings from 24 European countries,” investigates the correlation between mask usage and excess mortality across 24 European nations during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research sought to evaluate the effectiveness of population-level mask-wearing as a public health intervention, a topic that has sparked significant debate due to varying evidence on mask efficacy.
Study Methodology
The study encompassed a diverse set of European countries, including Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Researchers collected data from reputable sources such as the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Our World in Data, the World Bank, and the CIA World Factbook. Additional datasets included the Global Settlement Layer and a Zenodo archive.
To analyze the relationship between mask usage and excess mortality, the study employed both bivariate and multivariate regression analyses, adjusting for confounders such as vaccination rates, socioeconomic indicators, and the intensity of COVID-19 waves. Statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.1.0) and JASP, ensuring robust and transparent data processing. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm the consistency of the findings, enhancing the reliability of the results.
Key Findings
The study’s results revealed a significant positive correlation between mask usage and excess mortality. Countries with higher mask-wearing rates experienced elevated levels of age-adjusted excess mortality, as indicated by the bivariate Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.477 (p = 0.018) and the multivariate standardized coefficient of 0.52 (p = 0.0012).
Notably, the study found no significant association between mask usage and COVID-19 case rates (bivariate Spearman coefficient = -0.108), challenging the assumption that masks effectively reduce viral transmission at the population level. These findings were consistent across various sensitivity analyses, reinforcing the study’s conclusions.
Discussion, Hypotheses, and Limitations
The study aligns with prior research, such as a systematic review by Jefferson et al., which found no clear evidence that masks significantly reduce the risk of viral infections. The researchers propose several hypotheses to explain the positive correlation between mask usage and excess mortality. One theory suggests that prolonged mask-wearing may lead to adverse effects, such as the re-inhalation of viral particles or other physiological impacts. Other potential explanations include socioeconomic factors, healthcare system disparities, or the varying severity of COVID-19 waves across countries.
The authors emphasize the limitations of the observational study design, which precludes establishing causality. Unknown confounders, such as differences in public compliance with other non-pharmaceutical interventions or variations in testing protocols, may have influenced the results. This acknowledgment underscores the complexity of interpreting population-level data in public health research.
Why It’s Important to Study Excess Mortality
This study is particularly noteworthy for its use of excess mortality as an endpoint, which provides a broader measure of the pandemic’s impact compared to COVID-19-specific mortality rates. Excess mortality accounts for both direct and indirect deaths related to the pandemic, offering a more comprehensive perspective on public health outcomes. This approach highlights the study’s contribution to understanding the multifaceted effects of public health interventions during a global crisis.
Conclusion and Going Forward
In conclusion, despite what public health “experts” and policymakers recommended to the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study suggests that mask usage did not prevent COVID-19 transmission at the population level and may be associated with adverse health effects, as evidenced by the correlation with excess mortality. These researchers advocate for further randomized controlled trials to elucidate the impact of mask-wearing on public health outcomes and to inform evidence-based policymaking. This work underscores the complex relationship between mask usage and excess mortality, emphasizing the need for rigorous scientific inquiry to guide future public health strategies.
Behind the FDA Curtain: WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Reports is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://behindthefdacurtain.substack.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
