The Quiet Skies program, a TSA surveillance effort, got its wings clipped Thursday by the Trump administration. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem called it a Biden-era political weapon, misused to harass critics while sparing connected elites. It’s a bold move to restore trust in airport security.
The Trump administration ended the costly Quiet Skies program, which the Department of Homeland Security said was exploited for political gain under Biden. Costing $200 million annually since 2010, it flagged travelers as security risks for extra screening but failed to stop any terrorist attacks. That’s a pricey swing and a miss.
Operated by the TSA, Quiet Skies targeted those deemed “elevated security risks” by intelligence officials. These travelers faced enhanced screenings and potential monitoring by federal Air Marshals. Sounds reasonable, until you learn how the system was gamed.
Political Targeting Under Scrutiny
Secretary Noem didn’t mince words, accusing Biden’s team of turning Quiet Skies into a “political rolodex.” She claimed it wrongly targeted Tulsi Gabbard, a vocal Biden critic and Trump ally, during her campaign efforts. Meanwhile, well-connected figures allegedly skated through unscathed.
“It is clear that the Quiet Skies program was used as a political rolodex of the Biden Administration — weaponized against its foes,” Noem said. That’s a damning charge, suggesting security tools were bent to settle political scores. If true, it’s a betrayal of public trust.
Take William Shaheen, husband of New Hampshire Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen. DHS claimed he traveled with a “Known or Suspected Terrorist” three times, landing him on the Quiet Skies radar. Yet, somehow, he secured a blanket exemption from the program’s scrutiny.
Exemptions Raise Eyebrows
Senator Shaheen’s office admitted she contacted TSA after her husband endured “invasive and degrading” searches at checkpoints. She claimed ignorance of his Quiet Skies status or any exemption. That’s a convenient blind spot for a senator with clout.
“Senator Shaheen sought to understand the nature and cause of these searches,” her office stated. Fair enough, but pulling strings to bypass security protocols smells like privilege in action. Equal treatment under the law shouldn’t depend on who you know.
DHS alleges Senator Shaheen’s lobbying led to her husband’s exemption, a move that reeks of favoritism. Noem’s pushing for a Congressional investigation to dig deeper into this mess. Good—sunlight’s the best disinfectant for bureaucratic overreach.
Restoring TSA’s Core Mission
Noem insists TSA’s aviation security functions will stay intact despite Quiet Skies’ termination. “The Trump Administration will return TSA to its true mission of being laser-focused on the safety of the traveling public,” she said. That’s a promise every traveler wants to see kept.
The program’s $200 million annual price tag never yielded a single thwarted attack. For 15 years, taxpayers funded a system that served political agendas more than public safety. That’s not just waste—it’s malpractice.
Ending Quiet Skies sends a clear message: security shouldn’t be a partisan cudgel. The Biden administration’s alleged misuse turned a well-intentioned program into a tool for targeting foes. Actions, as they say, have consequences.
Calls for Accountability
Noem’s not stopping at shutting down the program—she wants answers. Her call for a Congressional probe, alongside an internal DHS review, signals a push for accountability. It’s about time someone held the powerful to the same standards as the rest of us.
Senator Shaheen’s defense—that she didn’t know her husband was flagged—raises more questions than it answers. If she wasn’t aware, why was she lobbying TSA on his behalf? That disconnect deserves a hard look.
The Quiet Skies saga exposes how easily security systems can be twisted for political ends. Restoring integrity to TSA means ensuring no one—critic or crony—gets special treatment. Here’s hoping the investigations deliver clarity and justice.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Benjamin Clark
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://americandigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
