84% of Abortion Pill Shipments are Going to Pro-Life States, We Must Stop This

The Journal of the American Medical Association has further tarnished its reputation.

“Research Letters” like this risk sullying the reputation of legitimate medical research.

The obvious goals of JAMA’s recent publication were to:

• Claim the masses of pregnant women depend upon mail order abortion.
• Defend the importance of shield laws protecting illegal abortionists and others who mail chemical abortion pills into states where the unborn are protected.
• Attempt to hang the mantle of “public health” on illegal and dubious abortion pill outlets.

Three PhDs looked at the sale of 118,338 chemical abortion pill kits provided by Aid Access, a major outlet of these dangerous mail order drugs intended to kill unborn babies.

HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

It is no surprise that 84% of Aid Access’ sales were in states with laws protecting its most vulnerable citizens, preborn children.

It also revealed the following:

• Sales were 3.12 times higher in states that protect all or nearly all unborn babies.
• Sales were 2.33 times stronger in states with specific laws against mail order abortions.
• Sales were more robust the farther women lived from abortion centers.
• The higher the percentage of poverty the higher the sales of abortion pills.
• The abortion industry has long preyed upon our nation’s poor and needy. Aid Access enjoyed an increase in sales of nearly twice as much in counties where poverty was over 20%.

The JAMA report concludes with this disreputable claim. “These findings underscore the public health importance of telemedicine, both as an alternative to the unsafe abortion methods that prevailed under abortion bans before Roe v Wade and as a means of reducing access disparities.”

With the post-Roe advent of suction machines, dismemberment abortions, injecting poison into the baby’s heart, and now the abortion pill, America will never regress to the archaic methods of abortion more than half a century ago. The suggestion demonstrates disingenuousness by the researchers.

Further JAMA and its researchers believe the only way to resolve “access disparities” is unrestricted abortion until birth throughout America. They advocate lawlessness in the face of legitimately enacted state laws that impede their abortion agenda.

Pro-life advocate Abby Johnson recently shared on our future podcast that within minutes she was able to have chemical abortion pills on their way to her home. Throughout the process there was never an interaction with an actual person. Every response was computer generated. This is not the picture painted by JAMA’s publication. It infers that every woman will have human interaction which is simply not true.

This paper lacked fairness and intellectual honesty. It was yet another failed attempt to shoehorn the cruel atrocities of unfettered abortion into mainstream medicine. 

LifeNews.com Note: Bradley Mattes is the President of Life Issues Institute, a national pro-life educational group.

The post 84% of Abortion Pill Shipments are Going to Pro-Life States, We Must Stop This appeared first on LifeNews.com.