Vaccines, Depopulation, and Nanotechnology – Part 2

The world was told by big pharma, big tech, and governments that the COVID “vaccines” were safe and effective, and mandates were eventually implemented by the federal government as well as many private businesses. As documented in , which was published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory Practice and Research. The proof of self-assembling nanotechnology is lengthy and is documented throughout several parts of the study:

Abstract

“…The contents of COVID-19 injectables were examined under a stereomicroscope at up to 400X magnification. Carefully preserved specimens were cultured in a range of distinct media to observe immediate and long-term cause-and-effect relationships between the injectables and living cells under carefully controlled conditions. From such research, reasonable inferences can be drawn about observed injuries worldwide that have occurred since the injectables were pressed upon billions of individuals. In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous — on the order of 3~4 x 106 per milliliter of the injectable — visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100 µm, or greater, of many different shapes. There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables, and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures. As time progressed during incubation, simple one- and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent, thin, flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains. Some of these seemed to appear and then disappear over time. Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.“

Introduction

“We also show microscopic evidence of self-assembling  structures appearing in various media in which the fluid form COVId-19 injectables, particularly, Pfizer and Moderna products, were incubated for up to 12 months or more…The fact that such nanotechnology is in the COVID-19 injectables was first discussed, we believe, by Campra and colleagues (2021a, 2021b; Spectroscopy & Campra, 2021) . They used much more powerful spectroscopic methods and equipment revealing what appeared to be programmable entities at the nano-level. More recently, Diblasi and Sangorrin (2024) have confirmed and extended the results of Campra and colleagues. In view of their findings, and our own, which are presented in detail below, we can reject the hypothesis that the self-assembling entities you will see in our **Results** section consist of nothing more than naturally forming crystals, mostly salt or cholesterol as was suggested by Bigtree and Cole (2022).”

Results

1. Direct Microscopic Examination: “When the Pfizer samples were incubated at body temperature for up to 2 days, they showed more development, seemed to become active as if responding to a command to change into various other forms… When the new original vial of Pfizer concentrate was examined under the stereomicroscope, it showed only a few moving worm-like entities or a few small particles, but contrastingly when it was diluted in a 1:6 ratio (0.3 ml : 1.8 ml) with normal saline following the recommended practice for injection into a human recipient, the contents appeared to wake up, come to life and get active, revealing a profusion of various shapes of rods, key-shaped structures, and other formations within a few minutes. These new entities did not resemble any known, natural, or identifiable organic entities (Figure 5b – new Pfizer).”
2. Blood and Semen Reactions to the Injectables: “Nevertheless, all the COVID-19 injectables showed consistently lethal impact on some sperm cells within a few minutes or hours….in both samples, it appeared that the COVID-19 injectables could produce pre-programmed, self-assembling structures though in lesser quantity in the sperm from the unvaccinated individual.”
3. Incubation Study for the Injectables: “after approximately 150 ~ 180 incubation days- specific algae-type magnetic bio-nano-robot like coils, dark irregular spirals, appeared near the bottom of the medium… In summary, the incubation study yielded tangible results. Various geometric chip-like structures self-assembled over the first two weeks of incubation…”
4. Heat, EMF, and UV Exposures Study:

Heat: “Culture dishes were placed directly on a heat template set at 36.5 degrees Celsius overnight. The next morning assembled nanostructures were observed floating over the surface of the medium in more discernible and developed shapes than before the heat (warming) exposure. Two to three weeks were needed for the growth of structures at room temperature (15~20°C) whereas one evening was needed for the same growth at body temperature (Figure 22).”

2. EMF- A. Wireless Recharger With a Cellular Phone: “The culture dishes were placed on the cellular phone, set in 5G streaming mode, over the wireless charger for about 1~2 hours… Even after 1 hour of exposure to the wireless recharger with a cellular phone in operational mode, Moderna showed noticeable immediate changes. The floating materials abruptly became larger and more numerous with sharper and more rectangular edges… In both Pfizer (Day 101) and Moderna (Day 36) culture dishes, after exposure to the wireless recharger, unidentifiable debris, likely micro-materials, seemed to disappear and leave in its wake a clean background.”

              B. External Hard Drive Exposure: “With the results of this preliminary study, it could be postulated that some kind of conditioned electric current can stimulate the nanostructure’s activity, while some conditioned magnetic current can hamper their activity.”

5. Recycling Pattern: “Given the observed long-term behavior of the structures, we offer the following model that suggests the sort of recycling patterns that appear to be present in the pre-programmed nanoparticles themselves. The patterns appear to coincide with an interval period when the activity of self-assembly is dormant. When adequate ambient and internal conditions are met, we postulate that these conditions trigger the materials to activate and reconstitute nano-circuits/ structures as outlined here.”

Discussion

“In this very journal, Segalla, (2023a, 2023b, 2023c) has shown that many of the named ingredients, in Figures 28 and 29, are extremely toxic.”

“Whereas we suppose that the announced ingredients and components of Figures 28 and 29 actually are present in the heavily marketed government-backed products, closer examinations and our own experimental studies show that there must also be unannounced nanomaterials that are invisible to standard microscopic examination.”

“Experts in genomics recently discovered that the cancer-promoting SV40 gene is present in the COVID-19 Pfizer and Moderna injectables (Murakami, 2023; McKernan et al., 2023). The connection to cancer has been well established (Shah, 2006).”

“Moreover, postmortem reports written by both medical professionals and embalmers have noted significant increased signs of bizarre thrombosis- likely due to the presence of unique, never-before-observed extremely elongated fibrous clots, categorically distinct from ordinary common blood clots, extricated from essentially every conduit system carrying fluids in the body… Having concluded various experiments and careful observational studies, we infer that the materials and their observed stages of development are not natural. They are synthetic, and elemental seeming to govern a well-programmed process of structural self-assembly. That their provisional final production could be described as artificial has already been suggested in the numerous articles referenced so far… The results of experiments with exposure to heat and electromagnetic energy were significant: short-term exposures showed remarkable changes in the self-assembled structures. Ultraviolet radiation, visible light, temperature, nitrogen, sources of carbon in the air, electromagnetic fields, various wave frequencies, and other factors can evidently trigger nanoparticles to react – whether to assemble or disassemble what appear to be pre-programmed structures…Sasha Latypova, an executive and researcher for the pharmaceutical industry, discovered an extreme deviation in side effects among the batch-to-batch vials of mRNA COVID-19 injectables. In a normal world, this sort of wildly uneven deviation would be intolerable in ordinary pharmaceutical products receiving routine oversight by regulatory bodies adhering strictly to established protocols and safety guidelines. Nevertheless, as the public has been reminded continually, we are living in a “new normal”. How, therefore, might we understand more generally this obvious deviation from the old normal? One way is to consider intentionality. These products were meant to serve foremost as experimental injections for the whole of humanity – including all ethnicities, sexes, and age groups.

This depiction squares with the FDA approval letter of the Comirnaty (Pfizer product, FDA, 2021), the post-marketing requirement, in infants under 6 months of age, the study completion of July 31, 2024, and the final report which is to be submitted by October 31, 2024. Worth noting is that in the accompanying documents for the injectable products all details referring to the factories where they were manufactured were conspicuously redacted, which begs larger questions about secrecy undermining informed consent.”

“As regards “vaccine” exposure to electromagnetic energy, preliminary observations show that the materials in the injectables react positively to wireless cell phone rechargers while they react negatively to external hard drives. As electromagnetic frequency-sensitive materials, it is plausible that the injectable contents are designed to act as a kind of sei-conductor… If the injectable contents are designed, in part, to serve as both software and hardware for the clandestine construction of intracorporeal networks as Kyrie and Broudy (2022) suggest, the contents likely interact with electromagnetic energy fields outside the body… In analysis of blood clots from vaccinated persons, a few filament-like structures were found attached to brownish homogenous cloudy white clots extracted from the middle layer of whole blood sediment. When in close proximity to an electromagnetic field, the filaments could possibly trigger the formation of a clot and, thus, disturb free blood or lymph flow. Given their microscopic size and wide distribution throughout the body, if these foreign materials interact with either inside or outside sources of energy, as the literature states, they could well become elongated, enlarged, and serve as mysterious modes of morbidity and eventual mortality.

“Significantly, mRNA technology is often marketed in terms of software as a kind of operating system or technology platform (per Moderna’s Website)… The geometric patterns of most of the self-assembled structures, as in electronic circuits or 3-dimensional chip-like structures, progressively degraded after about day 80 during incubation of the Pfizer booster (injection number 4, P4), which has a different timeline from the other injectables (P1, P2, & Moderna), while similar degradation patterns were also manifested. This means that the injected nanomaterials appear to be programmed to behave in the manner observed and to carry out regular intervals of self-assembly and disassembly. The entire process, we theorize, must be periodically re-enforced, likely through the prescribed regimen of new “booster shots” per CDC recommendations.” Figure 27 illustrates this process.

Beyond the pathophysiology described above, the theoretical work of nanotechnology described in the decades of literature appears to be present in the practical application of the mRNA “vaccines” especially in Pfizer and Moderna.”

“Regardless, isolating their origin could represent a significant discovery for the question of whether many, or even, most other pharmaceutical products and/ or manufacturing processes are already contaminated by nanotechnology. It is sobering to think that the covert technology may not be limited to the COVID-19 injectables… Research in nanomaterials engineering shows that Biohybrid Magnetic Robots (Microalgae-based Magnobots) could be produced and propelled throughout the body by a variety of triggering factors: electromagnetic energy, change in pH range, manipulation of glucose levels, and by varying light spectra with the aim of targeting certain tissues (Li et al., 2023). Observations during our incubation studies suggest the presence of magnobots, especially in the Pfizer sample.”

“Various kinds of transparent ribbons, films, coils, and spirals appeared in the Pfizer sample incubated in distilled water. These were very similar in structure to the micro- and magnetic-nanorobots already presented in numerous scholarly papers (Zhou et al., 2021). These structures, according to numerous researchers, could serve as signal conductors, biosensors, switches, and/ or electronics devices needed for the transhumanist movement toward a post-human society (Kyrie & Broudy, 2022; Mousavi et al., 2021; Bailey, 2022; King Abdullah University, 2021; Shiu et al., 2022; Zhou et al, 2021; Johnson, Broudy & Hughes, 2024a, 2024b, 2024c, 2024d). These structures could also serve as nanodevices such as plasmonic antennae or as transceivers for terahertz band communications (Jornet & Akyildiz, 2014). Nanostructures are known to be stimulated to grow and carry out functions from various triggers; visible light, temperature (heat), electromagnetic fields, ultraviolet radiation, water, carbon and oxygen via air, special electrolyte-Ca++. These phenomena we have been able to confirm through longitudinal observations.”

“Furthermore, the bundles and ribbons could be more durable and long-lasting silica, or they may be synthetic graphene-coated polymer nanotubes, or similar nanowires serving as conductors or semiconductors survivable to temperatures from 1000°C to 4,000°C according to the relevant research literature (Hagima, 2023b).”

“The perversions we have described suggest a clear correspondence to the communications infrastructure now appearing under construction in the long-planned well-funded Internet of Bodies, the IOB (Celik et al., 2022), a kind of synthetic global central nervous system – the details of which are also widely discussed and illustrated in the scholarly corpus. Biohybrid Magnetic Robots, in particular, represent a significant concern for researchers attempting to make sense of the responsiveness of these “biologicals” to energy sources. We echo the calls of other researchers engaged in similar studies: until the components can be verified and their long-term effects understood, a necessity flouted by calls for Emergency Use Authorization, an immediate global ban is needed.”

What is exposed in this study is such a high level of seriousness that this writer felt it necessary to include such lengthy documentation. Clearly the negatives of these shots do not outweigh the benefits! Aside from the evidence of the cancer-promoting SV40 gene being in the COVID shots, there is damning evidence of recycling patterns in programmable self- assembling nanoparticles, which appear to be assembling into fibrous clots that embalmers across the world have reported finding.

The documentation of self-assembling nanoparticles interacting with 5g is not limited to the above-mentioned study. Karen Kingston is a “med-legal advisor and biotech analyst with over 25 years of experience. She’s internationally recognized as an expert on the harmful biological effects caused by mRNA and other nanobiotechnologies.” She left her very lucrative career in big pharma so she can tell the world the details of the dangerous corruption that is plaguing government, various media, and especially medical establishments.

In a post on her Substack on October 18, 2022 titled Dismantling COVID-19 Deceptions: Why are Quantum Dots in the COVID-19 Injections?, she documents the use of quantum dot technology in COVID shots and how 5g interacts with this technology. She states, “Quantum dots and other nanotechnologies are foreign terms to most of us. They are alien concepts difficult for many people to comprehend even exist. Although not well-known, nanotechnologies such as quantum dot, hydrogels, graphene oxide, and single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT), have been used in consumer electronic devices, healthcare products, foods & beverage, military neuroweapons, and medical device research and applications for over a decade… Quantum dots are less than 1/100th the size of a micron. (Most viruses are several microns in size). While quantum dots cannot be seen by the human eye, the effects of quantum dots are not ‘invisible’ to our bodies.”

“The electromagnetic fields and frequencies emitted by quantum dots can cause emotional, psychological, and physical disease and dysfunction in our bodies. Quantum dots can be used as neuroweapons and can cause severe disruptions to your emotions, energy, physical abilities and your ability to think straight (brain fog)… Per MODERNA patent US 10703789 B2, which can be found on the MODERNA website, the technology for all mRNA COVID-19 vaccines uses lipid nanoparticle (LNP) technology… US 0028565 A1 is part of the intellectual property of MODERNA US 10703789 B2 and is for water-dispersible semi-conductive metallic nanoparticles. US 0028565 A1 patented the functionality of the nanotechnology in the COVID-19 bioweapon injections to ensure rapid, easy, and targeted biodistribution of the nanoparticles throughout the body… Per US 0028565 A1, quantum dot’s functionality is based on the quantum mechanics of the Bohr particle. Due to quantum mechanics, quantum dots that have been injected into American and global citizens by means of the COVID-19 bioweapons and can quite literally appear within the human body based on specific electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) or disappear based on specific frequencies. Per US 0028565 A1, quantum dots respond to high- and short- frequencies that emit blue light. At these higher frequencies, the quantum dots reduce in size enabling them to connect with, receive, and emit frequencies from the quantum field.

Use of quantum dot technology in humans is regulated by the Centers of Devices & Radiological Health (CDHR) of the FDA because they are electronic devices that emit radiation. Per the 2011 book publication, Quantum Confinement Effect, quantum dots are able to produce electromagnetic labels (i.e. Bluetooth addresses) inside the body and tag organs.

Per Quantum Confinement Effect, extensive animal research has been successfully completed using quantum dots to invade, target, and mark major organs, such as the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, spleen, and brain.

Per ThermoFisher Scientific’s website, quantum dot (Q-dot labels) can be used to target, track and trace, not only tissues, but even individual cells.

On February 23, 2022, ThermoFisher Scientific announced a 15-year manufacturing deal with Moderna for Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and other experimental mRNA vaccines. ThermoFisher Scientific had previously partnered with Moderna to manufacture their mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in 2021.”

On top of all of that, a lead scientist was caught on video by Project Veritas, admitting that the COVID shots are not safe or effective! Project Veritas goes on to state, “We didn’t do the typical tests,” said Joshua Rys, a Lead Scientist in Regulatory Affairs for Johnson & Johnson (J&J), revealed on hidden camera that the typical clinical process was abandoned for the COVID-19 vaccine, knowingly bypassing standard testing protocols under pressure from the U.S. government and public demand. He added, “This was just, ‘let’s test it on some lab models… and just throw it to the wind and see what happens.’”

There is a reason that those pushing the shots worked so hard to get it in as many bodies as possible. It has been documented that the nanotechnology likely interacts with electromagnetic energy fields outside the body, and mRNA technology is often marketed in terms of software as a kind of operating system. The authors of the study even question whether many, or even most other pharmaceutical products and/ or manufacturing processes are already contaminated by nanotechnology. It appears that a new reality of nanotechnology is being ushered in, and what is referred to as the “Internet of Bodies” is unfolding all around us! This new reality will be exposed in Part 3.

---

Brandon is a freelance journalist based in the metro-Milwaukee area. His work has been featured in Liberty Sentinel Media, Wisconsin Conservative Digest, and Reality News Media. He has worked full-time in politics for six years. This includes leading successful campaigns for legislatures at the state and congressional levels and successful deployments to get bills passed in Kentucky and Texas. In his spare time, he enjoys weightlifting, running, hiking, and listening to classic rock.