Well, folks, here’s a story that might make you raise an eyebrow: Ghislaine Maxwell, a woman tied to one of the most notorious scandals in recent memory, was a guest of honor at a Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) conference years after serious allegations against her surfaced, as the Daily Mail reports.
Newly uncovered evidence from CNN reveals that Maxwell, linked to Jeffrey Epstein’s horrific sex trafficking network, attended and was celebrated at the 2013 CGI gala hosted by the Clintons, despite public accusations dating back to 2009.
Let’s rewind to set the stage. By 2009, Maxwell faced a lawsuit from Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a victim who later tragically took her own life, alleging Maxwell recruited her as a teenager into Epstein’s abusive schemes. By 2011, her connection to Epstein, a convicted predator, was widely reported in American and British media.
Maxwell’s troubling presence at gala revealed
Fast forward to 2013, and somehow Maxwell found herself at the CGI conference, not just as an attendee but as an honoree for her TerraMar Project, a nonprofit focused on ocean conservation. It’s worth noting that over 600 people attended this event, per a Clinton Foundation representative, but her complimentary access — confirmed by a guest list reviewed by CNN — raises questions about vetting processes.
Photos and footage from the gala show Maxwell mingling with other “Commitment to Action” partners, as if her past accusations were mere footnotes. The TerraMar Project was one of over a dozen groups recognized for ocean protection efforts at CGI that year, which sounds noble until you remember the shadow cast by her associations.
Interestingly, Maxwell had been barred from Clinton events in 2011, yet there she was in 2013, rubbing elbows at a high-profile charity gala. The reason for this apparent reversal remains murky, and it’s hard not to wonder if influence or connections played a role in getting her back through the door.
Clinton Foundation defends move
A Clinton Foundation representative downplayed the controversy, stating, “This is about someone working on ocean conservation attending a charitable conference 12 years ago, along with thousands of other people, and nothing more.” Fair enough, but when that “someone” is linked to such grave allegations, shouldn’t there be a bit more scrutiny than a shrug?
Another statement from the foundation insisted, “The decisions on those comps were made, as they have been historically, at the staff level, which included the office of President Clinton.” If true, it suggests a troubling lack of oversight at higher levels — decisions like this shouldn’t just slip through the cracks.
The foundation also reiterated, “As we have consistently said, the Clintons know nothing about Jeffrey Epstein’s terrible crimes.” That may be so, but hosting Maxwell after years of public accusations doesn’t exactly scream due diligence, does it?
Maxwell’s own words raise eyebrows
Maxwell herself spoke about her involvement with CGI, saying, “I was part of the beginning process of the Clinton Global Initiative, and that was something that I helped with.” That’s quite a claim, positioning herself as a key player in a prestigious initiative while her troubling ties were already known to many.
She added, “And Epstein may have helped me help them. And in that context, he may well have involved himself, but only in the context of something I was trying to do.” Her attempt to frame Epstein’s involvement as incidental to her charitable work feels like a dodge — most folks would steer clear of such a tainted connection altogether.
Let’s not forget the aftermath. The TerraMar Project folded in 2019, shortly after Epstein’s death by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell, a grim end to a dark chapter. Maxwell, meanwhile, was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in prison for conspiring with Epstein to abuse minors, confirming the severity of her actions.
Questions linger
Looking at the broader picture, CGI has seen over 4,000 commitments to action since 2005, per the Clinton Foundation, which is commendable. But honoring Maxwell in 2013, amid a backdrop of lawsuits and media reports, casts a shadow over how such decisions are made.
Recently, the Department of Justice released a transcript of a nearly five-hour interview with Maxwell conducted by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, though details remain sparse in this context. It’s a reminder that her story — and the fallout — continues to unfold, even years later.
So, what’s the takeaway here? While charity galas are meant to celebrate good causes, inviting someone with Maxwell’s baggage suggests a blind spot that’s hard to ignore. Turns out, actions — or in this case, invitations — do have consequences, and the court of public opinion isn’t always so forgiving.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Mae Slater
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.conservativejournalreview.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.