Well, folks, the California Supreme Court just dropped a bombshell by swatting down a Republican bid to slow down a fast-moving redistricting plan that could reshape the state’s congressional lines.
In a nutshell, the court’s ruling on Wednesday allows Gov. Gavin Newsom’s legislative package to charge ahead, despite heated objections from GOP lawmakers over costs and transparency, as ABC News reports.
The drama kicked off when Republican state legislators petitioned the court for a 30-day waiting period before any action could be taken on new congressional maps tied to a proposed November special election.
Court slams door on GOP request
The court, in a no-nonsense ruling, declared that the petitioners didn’t make a strong enough case under the state Constitution to justify their request for a delay.
“The petition for writ of mandate and application for stay are denied,” the court stated, leaving no room for wiggle. And just like that, the GOP’s hopes for a breather were dashed quicker than a progressive policy at a conservative rally.
Meanwhile, on the same day, the California Legislature pushed forward with Newsom’s redistricting package, dubbed the “Election Rigging Response Act,” which includes three separate bills and sets the stage for that special election.
Special election costs spark firestorm
Republicans and Democrats locked horns over the price tag of this special vote, with estimates ranging from $230 million, according to Assemblymember Buffy Wicks. However, official numbers are still pending from the Department of Finance.
“No one has time to figure this out, where the money is going to come from,” grumbled Republican Assemblymember Dianne Dixon. Fair point — when taxpayers are on the hook, a little clarity wouldn’t hurt.
Another GOP voice, Assemblymember David Tangipa, echoed the frustration, asking, “I haven’t gotten a single answer on how the money’s going to get there.” It’s almost as if fiscal responsibility is an afterthought in Sacramento these days.
Democrats defend plan
On the other side of the aisle, Democrats framed the costly election as a necessary stand for democracy, with Assemblymember Isaac Bryan arguing, “If we’re talking about the cost of a special election versus the cost of our democracy… those costs seem well worth paying.” Noble words, but when the bill lands, will Californians feel the same?
Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire took a sharper jab, accusing GOP leaders of hypocrisy and bowing to outside influences while claiming, “In California’s plan, voters have the final say.” A nice sentiment, but skeptics might wonder if this is more about political maneuvering than voter empowerment.
As the dust settled, floor votes on this contentious legislation were slated for Thursday, August 21, 2025, in both the Assembly and Senate, promising another round of heated debate.
GOP seeks federal probe
Not ones to sit idle, Republican legislators announced they’re escalating the fight by sending a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice and federal attorneys in California, requesting an investigation into how these maps were drawn.
The letter, as reported by local media, alleges that some Democratic lawmakers may have tailored districts for personal gain and tied their votes to favorable lines — a claim that, if true, smells of the kind of backroom dealing conservatives have long warned about. Assemblymember Carl Demaio didn’t mince words at a Sacramento press conference, stating, “This corruption must end,” and hinting at the need for federal intervention.
While the California Supreme Court’s decision may have closed one door, the GOP’s resolve seems far from broken, with legislators like State Sen. Tony Strickland vowing, “Today’s Supreme Court decision is not the end of this fight.” And with tensions this high, it’s clear Sacramento’s latest power play is just getting started.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Mae Slater
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.conservativejournalreview.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
