Today, with his permission, I’m happy to offer up the latest thoughts from my friend Anton Wahlman, whose takes I don’t always agree with — but are always worth considering.
Anton is a brilliant analyst and has, many times in the past, help me see “blind spots” in analysis I’ve performed, whether it be of politics, macro or individual companies.
His Substack, Heresy And Liberty, is a must-subscribe. While his opinions sometimes seem far off the beaten path, his accuracy often surprises me — and his “fringe” analysis is exactly why I love supporting him — to think and consider angles we normally wouldn’t.
Anton is a former sell side analyst with UBS, Needham and ThinkEquity and now spends his days writing mostly about automobiles and other technology products.
Here’s his take on Trump’s recent meeting with Vladamir Putin.
How you know the Putin-Trump meeting was a success
The Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska ended a few short hours after it started, and it was by any intelligent standard a great meeting. We don’t have all the details yet, but the verdict is still clear.
Let’s first establish why the critics have no leg to stand on. From at least March 2022, no Western leader, whether in Europe or North America, ever bothered to meet with Putin. You would think that because there is a war going on, that such a meeting would be priority #1, but apparently they all failed this basic test: Macron, Mertz, Starmer, Meloni, Kristersson, Stubb and all the rest — most importantly, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. None of them lifted a finger to speak with Putin. Only one or two of them even placed a phone call to Putin over those three years. They were useless, which turned into being counterproductive.
A total failure 2022-2025
And what was the result of all this complete incompetence and unwillingness to talk with Putin? War and thousands dead.
When all of those leaders are now predictably coming out and complaining about Trump meeting with Putin, the simple fact is that they failed 100% of their own attempts — or perhaps we can call them “non-attempts.”
The idiotic European negotiation position
They are complaining that the US is not tougher on Russia. Well, that’s another way of saying that they want the war to continue.
Do they think they can win a war against Russia? If so, they are clueless. You can’t win a war against Russia in its home backyard, just like nobody can win a war against the US in its home backyard. Some have tried before:
-
Sweden, 1709
-
France, 1812
-
Germany, 1941
It did not end well for any of them. And it won’t end well for NATO, which is the driving force behind Ukraine, in 2022-2025 either. If by any chance there would be some advancements on the ground, Russia has 5,000 nukes and that’s the end of it. You don’t WANT to win a war against Russia, because if you do, then you will be wiped out. The whole idea of NATO going to war against Russia with Ukraine as a proxy was a total non-starter, and will always remain so.
It — a land war in Asia — was described in The Princess Bride as the biggest mistake in history:
Team Trump seems to understand this
Some people are easily persuaded by group pressure from the Russophobic peanut gallery who ran things under Biden, Obama, Bush and Clinton. Trump had some of them in his administration 2017-2021 too, and there are still a few of them around in 2025. However, this time Trump has some people around him who know the more accurate history of the matter: JD Vance, Steve Witkoff, David Sacks and Robert Kennedy Jr, among others. I suspect Don Jr plays a part too, in keeping President Trump from doing anything stupid about Ukraine that could lead to an escalation of the US involvement in the conflict.
The meeting: Positive signs
Everything that we saw and heard about the Anchorage meeting between Trump and Putin suggests that the US will now de-escalate the insane provocation against Russia via Ukraine. US military involvement is likely to be reduced to zero, and the focus can turn to productive areas such as trade, investment and tourism.
Prediction: War and economics
Ukraine and the Europeans may continue to hopelessly fight Russia in Ukraine. They may give up once Trump shows that the US will end its involvement, but it really doesn’t matter.
Whether there is a peace deal or not, Trump will sooner or later sign an economic cooperation agreement with Russia, and the focus will turn to the US and Russia benefiting from more trade, investment and tourism.
All the right people are bitching: Good
In the end, at least for now, as far as the Alaska meeting is concerned, we know it went well because of who is complaining about it: All the Russia-haters. This is a surefire sign. I hope Trump ignores them, or simply ensures that whatever he does, they remain unhappy.
QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.
This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier.
The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Quoth the Raven
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://quoththeraven.substack.com feed and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.