A surprising public gesture from Hillary Clinton—offering to nominate Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize if he ends the Ukraine war without territorial concessions—highlights the extraordinary stakes in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
At a Glance
- Hillary Clinton said she would nominate President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize if he brokered peace in Ukraine without Kyiv ceding territory.
- She made this remark on the Raging Moderates podcast hosted by Jessica Tarlov.
- The summit between Trump and Putin is taking place at Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska on August 15, 2025.
- Trump responded by calling Clinton’s comment “very nice” and joked he “may have to start liking her again.”
- Her stated condition reflects her goal of avoiding any capitulation to Putin or validation of his territorial ambitions.
Political Unlikely Pivot
In a notably conciliatory gesture, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton—Trump’s longtime political rival—said on the Raging Moderates podcast that she would nominate him if he secured a peace deal ending Russia’s war on Ukraine without Ukraine relinquishing any territory. She emphasized the need for a ceasefire, no territory exchange, and a withdrawal by Russia over time—on the condition that Trump acts as the “architect” of such a deal.
Watch now: Trump reacts to Hillary Clinton saying she’d nominate him for Nobel Peace Prize if he helps end war in Ukraine · New York Post
Clinton explained that her motivation was to avoid any outcome that would be seen as rewarding Russia for its invasion. She said her priority was ensuring Ukraine did not lose sovereign territory in a settlement, framing her remarks as rooted in safeguarding European security and the post-Cold War order.
Summit Optics Amid Escalating Conflict
The remarks come as President Trump prepares for a high-profile summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on August 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska. No concrete agreement emerged from this meeting; both leaders praised the talks, but negotiations yielded no ceasefire or formal commitments.
Nevertheless, Trump’s upbeat reaction to Clinton’s statement—calling it “very nice” and joking about re-evaluating his feelings toward her—added a layer of political theater to the proceedings. His remarks highlighted how Clinton’s surprising offer intersected with a moment of international focus on the Alaska summit.
Symbolism in Strategy
This gesture from Clinton is unusual in the American political landscape, given her longstanding rivalry with Trump dating back to the 2016 election. By saying she would support a Nobel nomination under specific terms, she highlighted the broader significance of resolving the war in Ukraine and recognized that such an achievement would transcend partisan divisions.
At the same time, Trump’s administration has already been the subject of multiple Nobel Peace Prize nominations for involvement in peace negotiations and ceasefires in other regions. Observers note that while such nominations are not uncommon, the political weight of an endorsement from a former rival like Clinton underscores the symbolic importance of the Ukraine conflict and the global attention it commands.
What Happens Next?
Trump’s next steps—which may involve further trilateral talks including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European partners—will determine whether Clinton’s surprising offer leads to any tangible diplomatic momentum. With the Norwegian Nobel Committee set to announce the 2025 Peace Prize laureate on October 10, global attention will remain fixed on whether the Alaska talks evolve into a framework for ending the conflict.
The outcome could represent either a fleeting political moment or a turning point in diplomacy, depending on whether any agreements move beyond symbolic gestures and into enforceable commitments. The prospect of Clinton and Trump aligning, however briefly, illustrates the extraordinary gravity the Ukraine war holds for both domestic politics and international security.
Sources
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editor
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://thecongressionalinsider.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
