Whistleblower claims Schiff leaked intel to undermine Trump

Bombshell allegations have surfaced accusing Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) of orchestrating leaks of classified information to sabotage President Donald Trump during the contentious Russiagate investigation, as the New York Post reports.

A whistleblower, once a Democrat staffer on the House Intelligence Committee, has come forward with claims that Schiff spearheaded a calculated effort to tarnish Trump’s reputation, driven by dashed hopes of leading the CIA under a different administration.

Back in 2016, after Trump’s unexpected victory, the mood among some on the House Intelligence Committee turned sour, with Schiff reportedly convinced he’d been robbed of a top intelligence post. The whistleblower, a seasoned insider with over two decades in the intelligence community and 12 years on the committee, described the atmosphere as “indescribable” in the wake of the election upset.

Uncovering Schiff’s alleged plans

In interviews with the FBI starting in 2017, the whistleblower revealed Schiff’s belief that he was destined for CIA leadership had a certain candidate prevailed. “Ranking member [Schiff] was particularly upset,” the whistleblower noted, hinting at a personal grudge that may have fueled later actions. Well, it seems disappointment can be a powerful motivator, though not always in the noblest direction.

By the time Trump took office as the 45th president, Schiff allegedly saw the election as tainted by foreign interference, viewing the nation as mired in a constitutional crisis. According to the whistleblower, this conviction led to a disturbing strategy: leaking sensitive information to the press to destabilize the administration.

During a staff meeting recalled in a 2023 FBI interview, Schiff purportedly laid out a plan to release classified details derogatory to Trump, with the explicit goal of building a case against him. “[Schiff] stated the group would leak classified information,” the whistleblower recounted. If true, this isn’t just playing hardball; it’s playing with fire in a way that could burn public trust.

Resistance, retaliation within official ranks

The whistleblower didn’t stay silent, objecting to the plan in that meeting and being assured by others that leakers wouldn’t face consequences. “They would not be caught,” participants reportedly claimed. Such confidence in dodging accountability raises eyebrows about the culture within certain corners of the committee.

Refusing to join in, the whistleblower labeled the leaking as “unethical and treasonous,” a stance that reportedly led to professional fallout. An FBI memo from 2017 noted the individual was dismissed, allegedly for a perceived lack of loyalty to party lines after declining to participate in the leaks. Actions, as they say, often carry a steeper price than words.

This insider took the concerns to the FBI, even participating in a mock grand jury hearing, but the Justice Department ultimately declined to pursue an investigation. Investigators cited protections under the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, though the whistleblower argued Schiff’s actions fell outside such safeguards.

Systematic leaks, named accomplices

The whistleblower described a troubling “system” among some Democrats on the committee, where sensitive data was funneled to Schiff, who then decided who would release it to the media. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) was singled out as a key figure in this operation, with claims that a highly sensitive document was leaked almost word-for-word within a day of being reviewed by a select few.

“Been warned to be careful,” the whistleblower said of Swalwell’s reputation for disclosing classified details. If accurate, this paints a picture of reckless disregard for national security in pursuit of political points.

Swalwell, when pressed on these accusations, fired back with defiance, refusing to be silenced by critics. “Come get me Kash,” he challenged, referencing FBI Director Kash Patel, who confirmed the declassification of related information on social media. It’s a bold stance, but bravado doesn’t erase questions about responsibility.

Broader implications, investigations awaited

These claims, first brought to light by Just the News, add fuel to long-standing concerns about the politicization of intelligence during the Trump-Russia probe, codenamed Crossfire Hurricane. Patel, a former aide to Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), has been vocal about exposing what he sees as institutional abuse, stating, “We declassified it.” His words suggest a push for transparency, though the battle over narratives continues.

Schiff’s role in these events isn’t new to controversy; he led Trump’s first impeachment in 2019 and was censured by House Republicans in 2023 for his actions during Russiagate, though he later won a Senate seat. Meanwhile, recent reports indicate a grand jury in Maryland is examining unrelated allegations of financial misconduct against him.

As investigations into other figures tied to the Trump-Russia probe unfold, including probes into former intelligence officials, the whistleblower’s account serves as a stark reminder of how trust in our institutions can be eroded by partisan agendas. The question remains whether accountability will catch up with ambition, or if political protections will shield those accused. Turns out, playing fast and loose with classified information might just leave a lasting mark on credibility.