Former CIA Director John Brennan’s alleged orchestration of a “seditious conspiracy” to undermine President Trump’s administration is now back under the microscope, with new documents purportedly shedding light on his role in promoting the Russian collusion narrative.
Story Highlights
- John Brennan accused of manipulating intelligence to support the Russian collusion narrative.
- The Steele dossier’s inclusion in the Intelligence Community Assessment remains controversial.
- New documents reportedly discovered by Kash Patel could impact ongoing investigations.
- Despite multiple reviews, no criminal charges have been filed against Brennan or other senior officials.
Allegations of Manipulation and Misconduct
In a saga that’s more tangled than a Thanksgiving turkey’s wishbone, former CIA Director John Brennan stands accused of spearheading a “seditious conspiracy” aimed at derailing Donald Trump’s presidency. According to critics, Brennan manipulated intelligence data to bolster the now-debunked Russian collusion narrative. The Steele dossier, a controversial piece of fiction masquerading as intelligence, played a critical role in the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) published in January 2017. This document, critics claim, was included at Brennan’s behest despite internal dissent from other intelligence officials.
Here Are the Top Lies John Brennan Told to Push the Russian Collusion Hoax https://t.co/iBqF0W4G7A
—
kam
(@pjkate) August 1, 2025
The allegations don’t stop there. Conservative commentators argue that Brennan’s actions were part of a broader strategy to damage Trump’s administration, a bold accusation that continues to fuel partisan debates. Despite various congressional and Department of Justice investigations into these claims, no criminal charges have been filed against Brennan or any other senior intelligence officials involved in the investigation. The Department of Justice Inspector General’s 2019 report did find procedural errors in the handling of the FISA applications, yet they concluded no evidence of political bias was present in the initiation of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
The Steele Dossier and Its Controversial Legacy
The Steele dossier, a document that should have been treated as tabloid fodder rather than credible intelligence, has been a focal point of contention. Brennan’s alleged insistence on its inclusion in the ICA has been criticized for muddying the waters of an already complex investigation. Critics argue that the dossier’s unverified claims were weaponized to justify surveillance on Trump campaign figures, a move seen by many as an overreach of power by intelligence agencies.
Despite these allegations, official investigations have yet to find concrete evidence of a conspiracy to undermine Trump. Instead, the narrative persists largely in partisan media circles, feeding a cycle of distrust and skepticism towards intelligence agencies. The fallout from this controversy continues to echo through the halls of Congress and the court of public opinion, where it has become a symbol of political manipulation and overreach.
Renewed Scrutiny and the Role of New Evidence
Enter Kash Patel, a former aide to Devin Nunes and now-Director of the FBI, who claims to have unearthed new evidence that could potentially reshape the narrative. Patel’s findings, which include what he describes as the “Durham annex,” are said to contain documents that might finally provide the smoking gun that conservative critics have long sought. These revelations could reignite calls for accountability and potentially lead to further Congressional inquiries.
While it remains to be seen what this new evidence will reveal, the renewed focus on Brennan and other intelligence officials underscores a broader issue of oversight and accountability within the intelligence community. The notion that a cabal of senior officials could manipulate intelligence for political ends is an unsettling prospect that continues to erode public trust in these institutions. The implications of such a breach, if proven, would be profound, potentially influencing future intelligence operations and oversight mechanisms.
Sources:
Inspector General Report on Crossfire Hurricane
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editor
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://libertynewsalerts.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
