CIA Bombshell: Top Analyst DENIES Russia Report!!

A retired CIA official who was widely reported as the principal author of the explosive 2017 intelligence assessment claiming Russian interference in the election is now backtracking, saying she didn’t actually write the report that launched years of investigations against President Trump.

Story Highlights

• Susan Miller, previously identified as key author of 2017 Russian interference report, now denies writing it
• DNI Tulsi Gabbard alleges Obama administration manipulated intelligence to damage Trump
• Miller’s team analysis reportedly formed basis of assessment but she claims no direct authorship
• Controversy reignites questions about politicization of intelligence agencies under Obama

The Great Intelligence Shell Game Exposed

Susan Miller, the retired CIA official who has been paraded around by the mainstream media as a credible defender of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, is now singing a different tune when pressed about her actual role. After years of media reports identifying her as a principal author of the assessment that concluded Russia interfered to help Trump, Miller suddenly claims she didn’t write it at all. Instead, she now says her team’s analysis merely “formed the basis” of the report.

This convenient backpedaling comes as DNI Tulsi Gabbard has been exposing the corrupt foundations of the Obama-era intelligence apparatus. Gabbard isn’t pulling punches, directly accusing Obama administration officials of manufacturing intelligence for political purposes. She’s calling for criminal referrals against former officials who orchestrated what amounts to one of the biggest political hoaxes in American history.

CIA Agent Who Reportedly Authored 2017 Report on Russian Collusion, Now Says She Didn’t Write It https://t.co/GzKnYdzZVR

— Dr. Bob (@RobertJJacobsen) August 1, 2025

Obama’s Intelligence Manipulation Machine

The timing of Miller’s revised story is no coincidence. With Trump back in office and real patriots like Gabbard cleaning house at the intelligence agencies, these deep state operatives are scrambling to cover their tracks. Miller insists that “no one, including then-President Barack Obama and CIA Director John Brennan, directed her team on what conclusion to reach.” But actions speak louder than words, and the coordinated effort to undermine a duly elected president tells the real story.

What we’re seeing is the classic Washington two-step. These bureaucrats want credit when it serves their purposes and plausible deniability when the heat gets turned up. Miller was happy to be the face of the intelligence community’s credibility when friendly media outlets needed a source to defend the Russia hoax. Now that accountability is coming, suddenly she’s just a humble analyst whose work was misrepresented.

The Media’s Complicit Role in the Deception

The mainstream media’s role in this deception cannot be overlooked. Outlets like NBC, CNN, and The Daily Beast have spent years propping up Miller as a credible source and using her statements to validate the discredited Russian interference narrative. They amplified her claims about the integrity of the intelligence process while conveniently ignoring the glaring inconsistencies in her story about her actual involvement.

These same media organizations that breathlessly reported every leak and rumor during the Trump years are now working overtime to provide cover for the Obama-era officials who weaponized our intelligence agencies. They’re treating Gabbard’s well-founded allegations as conspiracy theories while giving Miller and her cohorts a platform to revise history in real time.

Justice Delayed But Not Denied

The truth has a way of surfacing, and Miller’s changing story is just the beginning. With competent leadership back in charge of our intelligence agencies, Americans are finally getting answers about how the deep state operated during the Obama years. Gabbard’s demand for criminal referrals isn’t political theater – it’s long overdue accountability for officials who put partisan politics above their oath to the Constitution.

The fact that Miller is now distancing herself from the very report she previously defended speaks volumes about the integrity of the entire Russia investigation. If the assessment was based on solid intelligence and proper procedures, why is one of its supposed authors now claiming she didn’t write it? The answer is obvious to anyone willing to see past the partisan spin: because the whole thing was a politically motivated hit job from day one.