President Donald Trump has dropped a bombshell by firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Dr. Erika McEntarfer, over claims of cooked numbers, as Breitbart reports.
In a stunning move on Friday, Trump sacked McEntarfer after a dismal jobs report showed just 73,000 jobs added in July and unemployment climbing to 4.2%, while accusing her of manipulating data to prop up Vice President Kamala Harris’s political prospects last November.
The drama unfolded after the Department of Labor released the underwhelming July figures, far below what analysts had hoped to see. Trump didn’t hold back, alleging that McEntarfer, a Biden nominee, fudged employment stats to paint a rosier picture for Harris during her ultimately failed presidential campaign. It’s a serious charge, and one that raises eyebrows about the integrity of federal data under political pressure.
From bipartisan support to sudden exit
McEntarfer’s journey to the BLS top spot seemed solid when she was nominated by then-President Joe Biden in 2023 and confirmed by the Senate in 2024 with a bipartisan 86-8 vote. Even heavy hitters like then-Sens. JD Vance and Marco Rubio gave her the thumbs-up. How quickly the tide turns when numbers don’t add up.
Trump pointed to specific discrepancies, claiming the BLS overstated job growth by a whopping 818,000 in March 2024, followed by another inflated figure of 112,000 jobs in August and September. He’s not wrong to demand accuracy — policymakers rely on these reports to make critical decisions. If the data’s off, the ripple effects could be disastrous.
Adding fuel to the fire, McEntarfer herself reported a downward revision of 258,000 jobs for the prior two months, a confession of sorts that things weren’t as peachy as initially claimed. Trump noted similar negative adjustments earlier in the year, always trending downward. Sounds like a pattern, doesn’t it?
Trump’s takes to Truth platform
On Truth Social, Trump vented his frustration, stating, “I was just informed that our Country’s ‘Jobs Numbers’ are being produced by a Biden Appointee, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, who faked the Jobs Numbers.” He didn’t mince words, calling for her immediate ouster and branding the revisions a deliberate attempt to mislead. When trust in numbers erodes, so does trust in governance.
In another post, Trump declared, “She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.” He emphasized that key stats must remain untainted by political agendas, a fair point when you consider how much rides on economic perception. Let’s hope the next pick can restore some credibility.
Trump also mentioned a massive post-election revision on November 15, 2024, slashing over 818,000 jobs from earlier reports, which he labeled a “total scam.” It’s hard not to wonder if timing played a role in these adjustments. Convenient corrections after the spotlight dims?
White House weighs in on competency crisis
White House deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich backed Trump’s decision, asserting, “Wrong. She was fired after consistently getting it WRONG.” He argued that missing the mark by hundreds of thousands of jobs for over a year is simply unacceptable, especially when these figures guide major policy moves like Federal Reserve rate cuts.
Top White House economist Stephen Miran told CNN, “This jobs report isn’t ideal. There’s no way around that.” He attributed roughly 60% of the downward revisions to quirks in seasonal adjustments, but that explanation might not soothe those who see deeper systemic issues at play.
Trump didn’t stop at McEntarfer — he took a swipe at Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, alleging the Fed slashed interest rates twice before the election to bolster Harris’s chances. It’s a bold claim, and while monetary policy is complex, the optics of such moves can fuel suspicion. Timing, as they say, is everything.
Economic boom or bureaucratic blundering?
Despite the gloomy report, Trump insisted on Truth Social, “But, the good news is, our Country is doing GREAT!” It’s a classic glass-half-full take, but with unemployment ticking up to 4.2%, not everyone might share the optimism. Still, leadership means projecting strength, even amid turbulence.
The BLS, nestled within the Department of Labor, holds immense power over how we view the economy, and Trump’s directive to replace McEntarfer with someone more capable signals a push for accountability. If data can’t be trusted, what can? It’s a question worth pondering as this administration aims to steer the ship.
At the end of the day, this shake-up at the BLS isn’t just about numbers — it’s about trust in institutions that shape our understanding of America’s economic health. Trump’s move to clean house might ruffle feathers, but it sends a message: accuracy isn’t optional. Turns out, actions do have consequences, even in the staid world of statistics.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Mae Slater
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.conservativejournalreview.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
