Former ABC correspondent reveals network bias against Trump

Brace yourself for a rare glimpse behind the curtain of mainstream media as a veteran journalist spills the beans on bias at ABC News. Terry Moran, a former correspondent with nearly 28 years at the network, has come forward with a candid admission that his old employer tilted heavily against President Donald Trump, as Fox News reports. And no, this isn’t just sour grapes from a disgruntled ex-employee — it’s a sobering reflection on the state of journalism.

Moran’s revelations, shared through his Substack commentary, paint a picture of a newsroom lacking the kind of viewpoint diversity needed to fairly cover a figure as polarizing as Trump.

Let’s rewind to the start of Moran’s journey at ABC News, where he spent almost three decades climbing the ranks. Back when he joined, he noted the network was largely steered by a homogenous group of “White men,” though efforts were made over time to diversify the staff. But diversity of thought? That’s where things fell flat.

Unpacking lack of viewpoint diversity

“There are hardly any people who supported Donald Trump at ABC News,” Moran admitted. If that doesn’t raise an eyebrow, consider how a newsroom so lopsided in perspective can possibly claim to represent the heartbeat of a divided nation. It’s like trying to report on a football game while only interviewing one team’s fans.

Moran went further, describing this imbalance as a kind of “deafness” to the voices of everyday Americans. “The old news divisions don’t hear many of the voices of the country, because those voices aren’t in the newsroom,” he wrote. Well, isn’t that a polite way to say the echo chamber is real?

This isn’t just about ABC News, though — Moran’s critique extends to other legacy outlets like CBS, which he also commented on in his Substack piece. He suggested that without diverse perspectives, coverage often feels like an “anthropological” study of Trump supporters, as if they’re exotic creatures on display. Talk about missing the forest for the trees.

Moran’s exit and social media storm

Fast forward to June, when Moran’s long tenure at ABC came to an abrupt end. The network dropped him after he posted sharp criticisms of Trump and White House aide Stephen Miller on social media — comments that clearly crossed a line for his employers. Turns out, even seasoned journalists aren’t immune to the consequences of a hot take.

Regarding Miller, Moran didn’t hold back, writing that the aide’s “hatreds are his spiritual nourishment.” While the imagery is vivid, it’s hard not to wonder if such personal jabs reflect the very bias Moran now critiques. A mirror might be in order here.

As for Trump, Moran claimed the president’s animosity is merely a tool for “his own glorification.” It’s a biting assessment, but one that seems to ignore the genuine policy debates that fuel Trump’s base. If you’re going to call out bias, shouldn’t you also check your own?

Timing of Moran’s departure

Interestingly, Moran’s firing came less than six weeks after he sat down with Trump for a primetime special marking the president’s first 100 days in office. During that interview, Trump pushed back hard against Moran’s questioning, a clash that likely didn’t help smooth things over. Timing, as they say, is everything.

Adding to the context, Moran’s contract was already nearing its end when ABC pulled the plug. It’s unclear if the network was simply waiting for an excuse, but the social media outburst provided a convenient one. A lesson in keeping your powder dry, perhaps.

Despite the controversy, Moran stands by his anti-Trump post, expressing no regret for the remarks that cost him his job. An ABC staffer, speaking to Fox News Digital, described him as well-liked and not some radical ideologue, which makes his exit all the more puzzling. Sometimes, even the most beloved can trip over their own words.

Broader implications for media trust

Moran’s broader point about viewpoint diversity — or the lack thereof — strikes at the heart of why so many Americans distrust legacy media. When newsrooms become ideological bubbles, they risk alienating half the country, especially those who see Trump as a champion against an overreaching progressive agenda. It’s not malice, as Moran notes, but it’s a blind spot the size of Texas.

Even FCC Chairman Brendan Carr weighed in recently on a planned merger for CBS News, promising an ombudsman to tackle bias under new ownership. It’s a step, but will it be enough to rebuild trust in outlets that have long seemed out of touch with conservative values? Only time will tell if these institutions can course-correct.

Ultimately, Moran’s story serves as a wake-up call for an industry that claims to seek truth but often struggles to hear all sides. If legacy media wants to regain credibility, it might start by inviting a few more dissenting voices to the table. Otherwise, they’re just preaching to the choir — and a shrinking one at that.