Confirmed: Dems’ arguments against Trump would allow impeachment … of Obama!

Posted on by Constitutional Nobody
Americans seeking Barack Obama’s impeachment display messages from an overpass.

Impeach Obama!

Back in the day there were such slogans on bumper stickers, posters and the like.

They focused on his radical agenda that subjected Americans to what now is known as Obamacare, and other issues. His abuse of the nation, where he claimed it no longer is a “Christian nation” added to the sentiment.

But could it actually happen? Especially as declassified government documents now show Obama was a driver behind a grand conspiracy launched in 2016 against then-candidate Donald Trump and pursued by Democrats for years.

It involved false claims by the FBI and CIA about Trump’s campaign and “collusion” with Russia, which long since has been debunked. It involved protections for twice-failed Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton. It involved changing government documents to suggest bad things about Trump, and then “leaking” that to the leftist media. The depths essentially have not been probed yet.

According to Democrats, impeach of Obama, a former president, is possible.

That’s from one of the lawyers who defended Trump during his second impeachment, launched by Nancy Pelosi because of her claims that Jan. 6, 2021, at the Capitol was an “insurrection” that Trump orchestrated, claims that also have long since fallen into disrepute.

It’s from David Schoen, a lawyer specializing in federal criminal defense and civil rights, who was one of the lawyers representing Trump during his second impeachment trial, the one that happened after he left office.

“President Trump is right when he said the immunity decision would help President Obama,” Schoen said on Newsmax. “But you know what it doesn’t help him with? Impeachment.”

Schoen cited Article I, Section 3, Clause 7 of the Constitution — “the very clause that Democrats used during their second sham impeachment of President Trump to argue that a former president could still be tried and barred from holding office again. In doing so, they opened the door for the same standard to apply to Obama,” said a report at the Gateway Pundit.

“According to the Democratic Party and the House managers in the second impeachment trial, a former President, once out of office, is still subject to impeachment,” Schoen explained. “In other words, they’ve argued Lincoln could be impeached, George Washington impeached. Certainly, as I predicted at the time, this would come back — they would rue the day — because President Obama could be impeached if this evidence really says what it says. And that could also strip off the immunity, because under Article I, Section 3, Clause 7 of the Constitution, the Democrats argued it bars one from holding further office. The language itself says you’re still subject to criminal prosecution or indictment. We’ll see how that plays out.”

The Gateway Pundit explained Schoen’s comments were a “legal nuke” for the legacy of Obama.

WND previously reported that Trumps huge precedent at the Supreme Court only months ago establishing immunity for the occupant of the president’s office on a number of issues helps Obama.

Obama, along with his henchmen James Clapper, James Comey, John Brennan, possibly even Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, now are under several investigations for misleading the American public, suppressing an intel community conclusion that Russia was no big deal during the 2016 election, and instead rewriting reports to make it look bad for Trump.

That was the election the conspirators fabricated a Trump campaign-Russia collusion conspiracy theory for which there was no evidence.

Now that government records are being declassified that confirm it was made up, there’s rampant speculation about charges, including perjury, lying to Congress and more.

A reporter asked Trump about that immunity ruling.

He said, “It probably helps him [Obama] a lot, probably helps him a lot, the immunity ruling. But it doesn’t help the people around him at all. But it probably helps him a lot. He’s done criminal acts, there’s no question about it, but he has immunity, and it probably helped him a lot. He owes me big. Obama owes me big!”

The Supreme Court ruled that a president as total immunity for exercising “core” constitutional powers, and presumptive immunity for actions they took as president. The ruling gave no immunity for private actions.

That immunity is required, the opinion said, to protect an “energetic,” and “independent executive,” willing to take “bold” actions and make unpopular decisions when needed.

All of the cases brought against Trump between his first and second terms eventually died.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released evidence that Obama fabricated and led the Russia Collusion hoax to harm Trump as candidate and then president-elect.

Among the documents Gabbard declassified was a December 2016 presidential briefing confirming Obama knew the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was a hoax.

Trump, at that time, ripped Obama, Clinton, Biden, Clapper, Comey and others, and called Obama the “ringleader.”

“Barack Hussein Obama is the ringleader. Hillary Clinton was right there with him, and so was Sleepy Joe Biden, and so were the rest of them: Comey, Clapper, the whole group,” Trump charged.

Gabbard has confirmed those actions, by those people, are under DOJ review now.

Trump charged Obama with leading a “coup.”

Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Bob Unruh

This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.wnd.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.

USSANews.com
ussanews.com
ussanews.com
USSANews.com