MK-Ultra in Your Child’s Classroom

In the 1950s and 60s, the CIA initiated a covert psychological experiment known as

Echoes of MK-Ultra

The techniques used in SEL bear disturbing similarities to the psychological manipulation methods tested during MK-Ultra. While today’s tools are more sophisticated—and marketed as benevolent—they are no less invasive in their objectives.

1. Unfreezing the Mind
One of MK-Ultra’s foundational strategies was to dismantle a subject’s existing beliefs before rebuilding them with new ones. SEL follows a similar approach, often encouraging students to examine their upbringing, traditions, and identities through a negative or skeptical lens and ultimately reject them. This is achieved through “identity mapping,” vulnerability circles, and reflective exercises that prompt children to question their most fundamental beliefs. The phrase “unlearn to relearn” is a staple in SEL materials. But what exactly are children being asked to unlearn? Too often, the answer includes biblical principles, traditional gender roles, family structure, and even national identity. By destabilizing these anchors, SEL primes children to accept a new set of globalist, relativist values.

2. Behavior Modification through Psychological Conditioning
Just like MK-Ultra relied on psychological conditioning to elicit desired behaviors, SEL tracks student responses to emotional stimuli through ongoing assessments and behavioral nudges. Gamified platforms, digital dashboards, and classroom tools reward students for exhibiting “acceptable” attitudes while quietly flagging those who resist. Children are trained, often unconsciously, to respond to certain language cues, adopt “inclusive” terminology, and align their beliefs with what is deemed culturally or politically correct. Whether it’s views on race, gender identity, climate action, or morality, SEL seeks conformity, not critical thinking.

3. Data Collection and Profiling
Another alarming parallel is the data-driven nature of SEL. Much like MK-Ultra kept detailed records of its subjects’ responses, SEL programs rely heavily on continuous surveillance. Schools gather extensive data through surveys, digital journals, facial recognition software, classroom observations, and AI-driven mental health screening tools. This information is often stored in state-run databases or handed over to third-party vendors without clear safeguards. Over time, a psychological dossier is created on each student, tracking their emotional states, belief systems, and behavioral trends. This invasive profiling sets the foundation for predictive analytics, lifelong monitoring, and potentially even social credit scoring.

4. No Informed Consent
One of the darkest hallmarks of MK-Ultra was that participants had no idea they were part of an experiment. SEL follows a similar pattern, where children are subtly enrolled in emotional and ideological reprogramming without the knowledge or consent of their parents, or themselves when they are no longer minors. SEL content is often embedded in core subjects like math, reading, and science. Even digital platforms that appear academic frequently include embedded psychological questions, nudges, or worldview-based prompts. As a result, parents are unable to detect the full extent of the influence unless they are highly informed and actively involved. SEL practices bypass meaningful parental notice or opt-out options.

From the Classroom to the Collective

The ultimate goal of SEL isn’t simply to help children manage emotions or get along with peers. It aims to catalyze social transformation at the personal, cultural, and political levels. Organizations like CASEL are transparent about this aim. They openly state that SEL is a vehicle for “transformative change,” “equity,” “identity development,” and “justice-oriented citizenship.” These aren’t neutral terms. They represent a value-laden ideology aligned with progressive politics, global citizenship, and collectivist control.

Part of this transformation includes the creation of a data-driven “Portrait of a Graduate”—a comprehensive profile that evaluates students not just on academics, but on behaviors, beliefs, and social attitudes. This portrait follows them into college, the workforce, and beyond. It becomes their emotional and ideological resume. In essence, where MK-Ultra attempted to engineer the perfect compliant subject, SEL attempts to engineer the ideal global citizen, one who is emotionally malleable, ideologically aligned, and unlikely to question authority.

Conclusion

MK-Ultra was eventually exposed as a human rights violation and roundly condemned by Congress and the American public. But SEL, with its strikingly similar tactics, is being praised, funded, and expanded in broad daylight. Why? Because it has been cleverly repackaged as empathy, inclusion, and mental wellness, language that disarms even the most vigilant parents.

Truth In Education urges every parent, pastor, and policymaker to wake up. SEL is not just an educational framework; it is a psychological operation. It does not merely help kids manage emotions; it seeks to manage belief. It does not support mental health; it installs an ideological filter on the minds of the next generation. And all of this is being done, like MK-Ultra, without your informed consent.