Graham pushes for special counsel probe of Obama’s role in Russiagate hoax

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) just dropped a bombshell on national television, stirring the pot over former President Barack Obama’s alleged meddling in the narrative around Russian interference in the 2016 election.

On Sunday’s episode of NBC’s Meet the Press, Graham called for a special counsel to investigate new evidence that suggests Obama and his aides may have influenced intelligence assessments about Russia’s role in that pivotal election year, as Breitbart reports.

Let’s rewind to 2016, when the intelligence community reportedly told Obama there was no evidence linking Russia to efforts to sway the election’s outcome. According to Graham, that didn’t sit well with the then-president, who allegedly pushed for further digging. Well, surprise, the story changed by 2017.

Graham questions Obama’s influence on intel

By 2017, a new intelligence analysis emerged, confirming that Russia did attempt to interfere, though they didn’t succeed in altering the results. Graham finds this shift suspicious, and he’s not alone in wondering what — or who — caused the about-face.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard recently declassified documents that allege top Obama administration officials fabricated details about Russia’s involvement. That’s a serious charge, and Graham is running with it, insisting that someone needs to dig deeper into what happened behind closed doors.

“I’m not alleging he committed treason, but I am saying it bothers me,” Graham said of Obama’s potential role. Call it a polite jab, but the implication is clear: actions have consequences, and this looks like a narrative rewrite that demands answers.

New evidence sparks call for investigation

Host Kristen Welker pushed back during the interview, pointing out that Gabbard’s findings clash with a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report led by now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio. That report confirmed Russia’s interference, no ifs or buts.

Welker asked pointedly, “Do you actually believe that former President Obama committed treason?” It’s a loaded question, and Graham dodged the accusation while keeping the heat on the need for clarity.

“I’m saying this is new evidence,” Graham countered. “This is something I didn’t know.” He’s right to highlight the surprise factor — why are we just now hearing about a 2016 Intel assessment that cleared Russia of meddling?

Special Counsel as potential next step

Graham isn’t just tossing out theories; he’s got a plan. “The best way to handle this is… create a special counsel to look at it,” he urged. It’s a measured approach, avoiding the witch-hunt label while still pressing for accountability.

Let’s be real: the progressive agenda often paints conservatives as conspiracy nuts, but Graham’s call for an independent probe isn’t about wild accusations. It’s about ensuring that no one, not even a former president, gets a free pass when the facts smell fishy.

What’s at stake here isn’t just a dusty old election story; it’s trust in how our intelligence community operates. If a president can nudge the narrative until it fits a preferred outcome, what’s stopping that from happening again? That’s the quiet concern humming beneath Graham’s words.

Contradictions fuel conservative skepticism

The contradiction between Gabbard’s documents and Rubio’s Senate report is a sticking point. Conservatives have long been wary of entrenched bureaucrats shaping stories to fit political ends, and this feels like Exhibit A.

Graham’s push for a special counsel isn’t about dragging Obama through the mud — it’s about transparency. If the 2016 intel was accurate and then morphed by 2017, the public deserves to know who pulled the strings. Turns out, sunlight is still the best disinfectant.

So, where does this leave us? With more questions than answers, and a senator determined to get to the bottom of a story that just won’t stay buried. Graham’s stance is a reminder that in politics, the past isn’t always past—it’s a playbook for the future if we don’t pay attention.