(Natural News)—For years, parents and independent researchers have warned that aluminum in vaccines could be fueling the autism epidemic. Now, a bombshell investigation reveals that a Danish study, widely touted by mainstream media as “proof” of aluminum’s safety, was built on fraudulent methodology — and even its corrected data still hides the truth.
The study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, initially claimed no link between aluminum adjuvants and autism. But when corrected data surfaced, it showed the opposite: children exposed to higher aluminum doses had a significantly increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. The study’s authors, tied to vaccine-promoting institutions, manipulated data, excluded high-risk children, and refused to release raw findings — raising serious questions about who’s really protecting public health.
- The study compared children with nearly identical aluminum exposure levels, ensuring inconclusive results.
- Researchers excluded children with “implausibly high” vaccine doses — those most likely to show aluminum-related harm.
- No unvaccinated control group was included, a fatal flaw that skewed the findings.
- Corrected data revealed a statistically significant autism link, contradicting the authors’ original claims.
- Critics accuse the researchers of conflicts of interest, as their institution profits from vaccine distribution.
A study rigged from the start
The Danish research team, led by Anders Hviid of the Statens Serum Institut — a government agency that procures vaccines — claimed their analysis of 1.2 million children found “no evidence” linking aluminum to autism. But the study’s design guaranteed this outcome. Instead of comparing vaccinated children to unvaccinated ones, they only compared kids who received slightly different aluminum doses.
“It’s like comparing smokers who smoke 19 cigarettes a day to those who smoke 20 and declaring cigarettes harmless,” said Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense. “This isn’t science — it’s statistical trickery.”
Even worse, the researchers dismissed 34,000 children who received unusually high vaccine doses before age 2, labeling their cases as “documentation errors.” By excluding these children — who may have shown the clearest signs of aluminum toxicity — the study erased critical red flags.
The corrected data they don’t want you to see
Days after publication, the journal quietly updated the study’s supplementary materials, admitting the original version contained “incorrect” data. The corrected figures revealed a shocking truth: children who received higher aluminum doses had a 9.7 per 10,000 increased risk of autism compared to moderately dosed children.
Karl Jablonowski, senior research scientist at CHD, told The Defender: “The original version erased nearly 3,000 neurodevelopmental diagnoses. They made the sick kids disappear.”
Yet, despite the corrected data, the authors refused to revise their conclusions. Hviid, who previously told media outlets aluminum was safe, went on summer vacation, conveniently avoiding questions.
Aluminum’s dark history — and why they’re covering it up
Aluminum is a known neurotoxin. Independent research shows it:
- Crosses the blood-brain barrier, accumulating in brain tissue.
- Triggers IL-6, an inflammatory protein linked to autism.
- Is associated with a 36% higher asthma risk in U.S. children.
Chris Exley, Ph.D., a leading aluminum toxicologist, called the study a “nonscientific farce”: “They didn’t measure aluminum levels in the children’s blood or tissue. Why? Because real data would’ve exposed the truth.”
The study’s authors work for an institute that profits from vaccines. Hviid also received funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, tied to pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk. Critics argue this isn’t just bad science — it’s a conflict of interest.
The coming propaganda war
With Robert F. Kennedy Jr. now leading HHS and pushing for vaccine safety reforms, the medical establishment is scrambling to discredit aluminum concerns. Expect a flood of similarly flawed studies in the coming months, amplified by Big Tech and corporate media.
James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., founder of IPAK-EDU, warned: “They’re priming algorithms to push junk science and drown out dissent. Parents deserve real answers, not statistical fraud.”
The fight for transparency is just beginning. Until independent researchers gain access to raw data — and until unvaccinated children are included in studies — the truth about aluminum’s role in autism will remain buried.
Sources include:
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Lance D Johnson, Natural News
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://americafirstreport.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
