An appellate judge is downplaying his reported role in communicating with environmental activists seeking to educate judges on climate change and related litigation while his testimonial rides high on the group’s website.
The Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) — which describes itself as a “first-of-its-kind effort” to educate judges on the impacts of climate change — reportedly operated an email-formatted listserv with judges for years focusing on climate issues and related litigation, according to Fox News. Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Stephen “Sam” Scheele maintains that he doesn’t recall substantively messaging with CJP on any purported listserv, though he reportedly championed the group in an unearthed email while CJP’s website prominently displays a testimonial attributed to him.
While CJP claims to be objective, critics of the organization have argued that its purpose is to influence judges with left-leaning talking points on climate change and related litigation in order to steer the courts toward rulings that favor the green movement’s preferred policy outcomes.
“It’s been truly a privilege. I am welcomingly absorbing everything that has been brought to us, and I look forward to carrying that forward and paying it forward,” Scheele’s testimonial on CJP’s website reads.
Despite Scheele’s positive review of CJP on the group’s website, a spokesperson commenting on his behalf said that Scheele does not remember being part of any meaningful communication on the listserv.
“Judge Scheele does not recall any substantive communication on the ‘listserv’ mentioned. He, like all of our Court of Appeals of Indiana judges, is dedicated to the unbiased, apolitical administration of justice in the State. He, like all of our judges, educates himself on emergent topics in the law and applies his legal training to evaluate the legal issues before him,” Director of Communications for the Court of Appeals of Indiana Anne Fuchs told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Scheele’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment regarding his testimonial on the CJP website.
Several massive climate lawsuits are pending nationwide in Democrat-leaning jurisdictions based on the premise that fossil fuel companies have misled the public, allegedly knowing that their products would cause climate change-related harm and pushing them anyway. If the plaintiffs in these cases have their way, energy companies will be slapped with hefty fines and U.S. energy costs will climb, industry experts explained to the DCNF previously.
CJP was reportedly contacting judges directly from September 2022 to May 2024 through a website titled “judicial leaders in climate science,” and a link to the forum was public until it was recently taken down, according to Fox News. At least five judges, including Scheele, and multiple CJP members shared climate studies and updated the group about climate litigation according to the outlet.
“This is great work/great stuff, Travis; congrats on a job well-done, & thank you so much for sharing this!” Scheele reportedly wrote on the listserv in response to a video presentation about climate change, according to Fox News. The video was shared by a different member of the forum with a note that requested the group not forward the presentation, according to the publication.
One message on the listserv from a CJP member reportedly read, “it isn’t too late for us to act,” arguing that the looming effects of climate change can be fought. The message also suggested that the group should read CJP’s climate materials, including “Climate Science 101” and “Climate Litigation 101,” according to Fox News.
Judges communicating with climate activists has bred controversy. Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz accused CJP of trying to manipulate judges in a Senate hearing in June, alleging that the group is funded by left-wing activists and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
“They fund CJP to train judges,” Cruz said. “So, quote, unquote, train in climate science and make them agreeable to creative climate litigation tactics. Then, these left-wing bankrollers turn around and fund the climate litigators who will bring these bogus cases before those same judges that they’ve just indoctrinated.”
CJP did not respond to the DCNF’s multiple requests for comment.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Audrey Streb
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.bizpacreview.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
