Shocking allegations surfaced as Rep. Jim Jordan exposed a supposed Obama administration scheme to sabotage Donald Trump’s 2016 victory. The Ohio Republican, never one to shy from a fight, claims a high-level Oval Office meeting set the stage for a years-long campaign to tarnish Trump with baseless Russia collusion claims. This isn’t just political theater—it’s a call to unearth a potential abuse of power.
Jordan, speaking on “The First” with Jesse Kelly, laid out a conspiracy that began on Dec. 9, 2016, in the Oval Office. He alleges that then-President Obama, alongside intelligence heavyweights like Comey, Clapper, Brennan, McCabe, and Lynch, rejected the intelligence community’s finding of no Trump-Russia collusion. This meeting, Jordan insists, was the genesis of a deliberate effort to “trap and undermine” Trump’s presidency.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard dropped a bombshell Friday, releasing documents that she says expose a “years-long coup” against Trump post-election. Jordan praised Gabbard’s move as “exactly the right thing,” arguing it provides concrete evidence of a coordinated attack. These documents, he claims, demand a full Justice Department investigation under Attorney General Pam Bondi.
High-Stakes Oval Office Meeting
Jordan’s narrative hinges on that December 2016 gathering, where he says Obama and his team plotted to dismiss the no-collusion assessment. “It’s between election day and inauguration day, and they’re figuring out what to do,” Jordan told Kelly, painting a picture of a panicked administration. The idea that a sitting president would orchestrate such a move is as bold as it is unsettling.
The congressman didn’t mince words, calling the alleged actions “wrong as wrong can be.” He insists this wasn’t just a misstep but a calculated effort to destabilize Trump’s legitimacy. Yet, Jordan’s fiery rhetoric meets skepticism from those who see this as partisan score-settling.
Obama’s spokesperson, Patrick Rodenbush, fired back on X, labeling the claims “ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.” He argues the documents don’t dispute Russia’s 2016 election meddling, only that no votes were manipulated. Rodenbush’s dismissal, though, feels like a sidestep to conservatives who smell a cover-up.
Documents Fuel the Fire
Gabbard’s memo and documents have lit a fuse under Jordan’s push for accountability. The House Judiciary Committee chairman urged the Justice Department to dive deep, saying, “That’s going to be up to the Attorney General.” Bondi, known for her no-nonsense approach, now faces pressure to act on what Jordan sees as damning evidence.
Jordan’s call for a probe isn’t about vengeance, he claims, but about justice. “I do think it’s important for us as Republicans, we as people who love this country, not to be vengeful but also say, look, accountability’s important,” he told Kelly. This balance—passion without pettiness—is a tightrope walk for a MAGA-aligned figure like Jordan.
Rodenbush’s counterpoint, that Russia’s influence is undisputed, leans on a 2020 Senate Intelligence Committee report chaired by Marco Rubio. That report confirmed Russia’s meddling but found no vote tampering. It’s a nuance that Jordan’s critics wield to blunt his narrative, yet it doesn’t fully erase the shadow of the alleged Oval Office plot.
Past Probes, New Questions
The Steele Dossier, a key piece of the Russia collusion saga, adds another layer to Jordan’s case. Special Counsel John Durham’s 2023 report found the FBI couldn’t verify the dossier’s claims, which were used to surveil Trump associates like Carter Page. This failure, Jordan argues, points to a weaponized intelligence process that demands scrutiny.
Jordan’s accusations echo a warning from Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, who once said the intelligence community could target Trump “six ways from Sunday.” That quote, meant as a caution, now fuels conservative suspicions of a deep-state vendetta. It’s a chilling reminder of the power wielded behind closed doors.
Yet, Rodenbush’s pushback isn’t without weight—calling the allegations “outrageous” suggests a confidence that the documents lack the smoking gun Jordan claims. His insistence that Russia’s actions are well-documented shifts focus from conspiracy to fact. It’s a clever pivot, but it dodges the core issue of intent.
Justice Department’s Next Move
Jordan’s plea for a thorough investigation now rests with Bondi’s Justice Department. He’s clear that any probe must stay “within the law, within what’s fair,” but his urgency is palpable. The idea of a former president orchestrating a political hit job isn’t just gossip—it’s a challenge to democratic trust.
For conservatives, this story is a rallying cry against perceived elites who play dirty to cling to power. Jordan’s push, backed by Gabbard’s documents, taps into a deep distrust of institutions that many on the right feel have been weaponized. Still, the lack of concrete evidence beyond the documents keeps the debate fiery but unresolved.
As the Justice Department weighs its next steps, Jordan’s allegations keep the spotlight on a divisive chapter of American politics. Whether this leads to accountability or fizzles as another partisan skirmish remains to be seen. For now, the call to investigate “to the fullest extent” is a battle cry for truth—or a distraction, depending on where you stand.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Benjamin Clark
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://americandigest.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
