Los Angeles County has resumed transferring jail inmates to ICE custody for the first time since 2020, reigniting fierce debates over sanctuary policies and federal immigration enforcement.
At a Glance
- LA County transferred 20 inmates to ICE in May and June 2025.
- Transfers were conducted using federal judicial warrants.
- This marks the first such transfer since early 2020.
- The move raises questions about the future of sanctuary policies.
Resumption of Transfers Ignites Debate
In a surprising development, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) has transferred 20 jail inmates to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over the past two months. This marks the first such transfers since early 2020, when California’s sanctuary laws severely restricted cooperation with federal immigration authorities. These transfers have sparked a renewed debate over the balance between local sanctuary policies and federal immigration enforcement.
The LASD utilized federal judicial warrants to carry out these transfers, a legal mechanism that remains viable under California’s sanctuary laws. This move signals a potential shift in local-federal cooperation on immigration enforcement, drawing both criticism and support from various stakeholders. The demographic breakdown of the transferred inmates includes individuals from Mexico, Guatemala, Colombia, El Salvador, and Honduras, with charges ranging from felony voluntary manslaughter to domestic violence.
Legal Mechanism and Compliance
All but one transfer was conducted under federal judicial warrants, a legal pathway not blocked by sanctuary policies. The use of these warrants allows ICE to obtain custody of inmates even in jurisdictions with strict sanctuary laws. Legal experts and the LA County Inspector General have confirmed that these transfers comply with both state and federal law. They argue that the judicial warrants represent a narrow legal pathway that doesn’t violate the sanctuary policies in place.
This development has significant implications not only for Los Angeles County but also for other jurisdictions with similar sanctuary policies. It sets a precedent that could influence future cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities. The move has already prompted discussions about the limits of sanctuary laws and the potential for future legislative or legal challenges.
Impact on Immigrant Communities and Local Politics
The resumption of inmate transfers to ICE custody could have both short-term and long-term effects on immigrant communities in Los Angeles. In the short term, these actions may increase fear and anxiety among undocumented immigrants, potentially eroding trust in local law enforcement. Long-term implications could include a reevaluation of sanctuary policies and increased scrutiny from advocacy groups and local officials.
Politically, this development has reignited debates over sanctuary policies and their effectiveness in protecting immigrant communities. Local officials and advocacy groups may intensify their efforts to monitor and challenge such transfers, arguing that they undermine the intent of sanctuary laws. On the other hand, supporters of the transfers argue that they target individuals with serious criminal convictions and are in line with legal obligations.
Sources:
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: editor
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://republicannews.org and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
