When even a Democratic lawmaker admits that some folks might actually mean it when they chant “globalize the intifada,” it makes you wonder just how deep the rabbit hole of political insanity goes.
The Unsettling Resurgence of a Dangerous Slogan
The phrase “globalize the intifada” has resurfaced in recent years, creating a whirlwind of controversy in the political arena. Originating from uprisings against Israeli occupation, it carries a heavy historical load of violence and terror. Yet, some activists argue it’s merely a call for resistance against oppression. It’s a distinction that Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic mayoral candidate in New York City, seems to cling to as he stubbornly refuses to outright condemn it.
Mamdani’s stance has drawn national attention and criticism from various quarters, including Jewish organizations like the American Jewish Committee. They argue the phrase is inherently violent and incites attacks against Jews worldwide. While Mamdani claims he would not use the term himself, his reluctance to denounce it outright suggests a troubling alignment with extreme views that could have serious implications for community safety.
Political Ripples and Party Dynamics
The refusal of Mamdani to explicitly condemn the phrase “globalize the intifada” has not only put his campaign under severe scrutiny but also exposed rifts within the Democratic Party. High-profile figures like Hakeem Jeffries and Ritchie Torres have distanced themselves from Mamdani’s stance, highlighting the unacceptable nature of such rhetoric. This internal discord underscores the challenging balance the party attempts to strike between progressive activism and mainstream political acceptability.
Zohran Mamdani is a communist who wants to seize the means of production, globalize the intifada, and wipe out American prosperity. pic.twitter.com/kJ6ZE9cI0C
— Congressman Brandon Gill (@RepBrandonGill) July 10, 2025
As if that weren’t enough, Rep. Andre Carson’s ambiguous defense of Mamdani’s right to interpret the phrase further muddies the waters. Carson’s acknowledgment that some people might take the slogan literally should be a wake-up call to anyone still clinging to the notion that these words are harmless. The time for tiptoeing around extremist rhetoric has long passed.
The Broader Impact and Social Consequences
The controversy surrounding “globalize the intifada” isn’t just a political spectacle; it has real-world consequences that ripple across communities. Jewish communities are understandably anxious, given the phrase’s history and the potential for inciting violence. This anxiety is exacerbated by incidents like the 2022 “Boston Mapping Project,” which published addresses of Jewish organizations, further blurring the line between activism and intimidation.
‘RADICAL LEFT’: NYC mayoral candidate @ZohranKMamdani‘s decision to stop using the phrase “globalize the intifada” is a purely political move, considering that he has yet to condemn it, “StopAntisemitism” founder Liora Rez says. pic.twitter.com/HnQrtcAQvb
— Fox News (@FoxNews) July 20, 2025
Moreover, the business community in New York City has expressed concerns about the city’s image and stability. The fear is that if rhetoric perceived as inciting violence isn’t clearly condemned, it could lead to increased polarization and even incidents of hate speech or violence. The stakes couldn’t be higher, and the need for clear, unequivocal denunciation of such rhetoric has never been more urgent.
Sources:
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editorial Team
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.conservativecardinal.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
