Judge orders progressive city’s officials to finally do something about the park where people are publicly fornicating in

For some reason, the left believes it’s compassionate to allow degenerate individuals to engage in debauchery in public, despite the impact it has on the rest of the population. Their compassion seems to lie more with those committing crimes and engaging in degeneracy than with the majority of law-abiding citizens. Even though public parks are often places for children and families, Seattle still thought it made them morally superior to let one park become a hub for “public sex and masturbation, indecent exposure, and lewd conduct.” But just because city officials turn a blind eye to this disgusting and deranged behavior doesn’t mean they’re legally or morally in the right. That’s why a judge has now stepped in—because the city failed to meet even the bare minimum in upholding law and order.

A judge has mandated that Seattle temporarily shut down Denny Blaine Park unless the city presents a plan within two weeks to tackle what the court has deemed a public nuisance, citing continued illegal activities such as public sex and indecent exposure.

According to The Post Millennial

The ruling, issued Monday, comes after a neighborhood group, Denny Blaine Park for All, filed a lawsuit earlier this year accusing the city of allowing the waterfront park to become a “regional venue for criminal and uncivil behavior.” The group claims the park has been overtaken by lewd conduct, drug use, and harassment, creating an unsafe environment for nearby families and parkgoers.

Seattle City Attorney Ann Davison had previously urged the court not to shut down the park, arguing that while criminal behavior such as public sex and drug use should be addressed, nudity alone should not be considered a nuisance. In court filings, Davison defended the park’s identity as a “queer nude space” with “social utility.”

Why would the city attorney argue that “nudity alone should not be considered a nuisance”? Why is this something the city is so strangely compassionate about, and why is it so important to have a public park effectively dedicated to this kind of behavior? It’s completely deranged and absolutely not what local government was ever meant to support.

But Judge Samuel Chung disagreed, ruling that the way nudity has been expressed at the park, including alleged public masturbation and sexually aggressive conduct, amounts to a public nuisance. “I’m finding that nudity, as constituted at the park, does constitute a public nuisance, so that should be an included item in the abatement plan,” Judge Chung said.

The city has effectively allowed drug use and public nudity to occur unchecked, choosing to turn a blind eye to the behavior that inevitably follows. How can that possibly be justified? In their effort to defend this kind of lawlessness, city officials have revealed their true priorities—and it’s worse than anyone could have imagined. So while it remains unclear what will ultimately happen to this nudist haven for drug users, at least this court ruling is a step in the right direction. Still, the fact that such a ruling was even necessary is a scandal in itself—one that seems possible only in areas governed by the most extreme progressive ideologies.

– YouTube www.youtube.com