Armed Attack on ICE Facility Ignored by Media

An armed assault on federal law enforcement on American soil shouldn’t just be a headline—it should be a national outrage. Yet here we are, with barely a whisper from the mainstream media about the July 4th attack on the Prairieland ICE Detention Center in Texas. One ICE officer was wounded. One suspect remains on the run. And disturbingly, this wasn’t a lone-wolf incident—it was a coordinated ambush involving up to a dozen individuals. If that doesn’t sound like domestic terrorism, what does?

Let’s be clear: this was not a protest. This was not a demonstration gone too far. This was a premeditated, armed attack on a federal facility, carried out by individuals who apparently believe they are above the law. And worse yet, they’re being shielded—both literally and ideologically—by a culture that treats law enforcement as villains and criminals as folk heroes.

The prime suspect, 32-year-old Benjamin Hanil Song, is still at large. Song is a former Marine Corps reservist—trained, capable, and according to federal officials, armed and dangerous. He didn’t act alone. Authorities have already arrested 14 people connected to the attack. Two others, John Phillip Thomas and Lynette Read Sharp, have just been charged as accessories after the fact. The details in the court documents are chilling: Thomas admitted to living with Song until just before the attack. He purchased clothing for Song after the shooting and helped coordinate his escape. Sharp allegedly used encrypted chat apps to facilitate Song’s transport to another individual.

This was a network. Organized, deliberate, and dangerous.

And yet, where is the national coverage? Where are the primetime panels asking how a dozen people plotted an armed attack on a federal detention center? Where are the think pieces about rising anti-government extremism—this time from the far-left? Because let’s not kid ourselves: this wasn’t a right-wing militia. This wasn’t a Trump rally that someone tried to smear as violent. This was an attack on ICE—an agency demonized for years by progressives who’ve spent more time defending illegal immigrants than supporting the men and women who enforce our laws.

You don’t have to look far for the ideological rot that feeds this kind of violence. Remember when Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez smeared ICE detention centers as “concentration camps”? Or when leftist mobs in Portland tried to barricade ICE agents inside a building? That rhetoric has consequences. It tells radicals they’re justified. It tells them they’re freedom fighters. And eventually, someone picks up an AR-15 and acts on it.

President Trump has made it clear: under his administration, law enforcement will be supported—not sabotaged. This is a moment for strength, not softness. As Acting U.S. Attorney Nancy Larson put it, “He is running out of people to go to.” Good. But we should be asking how he had so many to begin with. Who radicalized this man? Who gave him cover? Who helped him believe that opening fire on ICE officers made him some kind of hero?

The FBI is offering $25,000 for information leading to Song’s arrest. That’s the right move. But let’s not stop there. Every person who aided and abetted this fugitive needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Every online chat group, every encrypted message, every accomplice—drag it into the sunlight. And let’s not pretend this is some isolated act. It’s the end result of years of demonizing federal agents and excusing lawlessness in the name of politics.

This is what happens when you normalize lawbreaking. When sanctuary cities defy federal immigration laws. When prosecutors refuse to jail violent offenders. When the left elevates civil disobedience into a virtue and treats ICE agents as oppressors rather than protectors. That’s the cultural cancer that led to this attack.

We must not allow this to fade from the headlines. Americans need to know that our law enforcement officers are under siege—and not just by criminals, but by an ideology that despises the very idea of borders, sovereignty, and accountability.

This isn’t just about Texas. This is about the rule of law. Either we defend it—or we lose it.