Federal judges have slammed the door on Donald Trump’s appeal in the E. Jean Carroll case, upholding a staggering multi-million dollar verdict and leaving millions of Americans wondering if the justice system is now just another weapon for political payback.
Federal Appeals Court Doubles Down: Trump Must Pay Carroll
The judicial sledgehammer came down on July 11, 2025, when the Second Circuit Court of Appeals refused to overturn the $5 million verdict against Trump in the E. Jean Carroll legal saga. The court didn’t just bat down Trump’s appeal; it also dismissed his request for an en banc hearing, leaving the former president with little room to maneuver besides a Hail Mary to the Supreme Court. This is the same judiciary that allowed the jury to hear the infamous Access Hollywood tape and testimony from other women with similar accusations—evidence that would make any defense attorney’s blood run cold. Yet, in an era where “due process” seems to mean whatever a judge says it means this week, the system kept the floodgates wide open for anything that painted Trump in the worst possible light. The message from the bench: the rules are what we say they are, especially if your name is Donald Trump.
Trump now faces a 90-day deadline to comply with the ruling, which could mean shelling out millions or launching another legal battle in front of a Supreme Court that’s hardly a sure thing these days. Carroll, meanwhile, is celebrating the appellate decision as a victory for survivors and “closure” to what she paints as a long, grueling battle for justice. The verdict, and the court’s full-throated defense of it, come as no surprise to those of us who’ve watched the legal system morph into a cudgel for settling political scores. If you’re left shaking your head about how we got here, join the club.
Origins of a Never-Ending Political Grudge Match
The Carroll case traces its roots back to 1996, when the writer accused Trump of sexual assault in a Manhattan department store. Decades later, after Trump dismissed the allegations as fiction cooked up for book sales, Carroll filed a defamation suit. Fast forward to 2022: New York’s Adult Survivors Act opened the floodgates for lawsuits from decades past, and Carroll quickly expanded her case to include sexual assault claims. In May 2023, a jury found Trump liable and ordered him to pay $5 million. Just months later, a second jury tacked on another $83.3 million after Trump doubled down with more statements Carroll claimed were defamatory. Each round of litigation was like déjà vu: more evidence, more headlines, more money changing hands—just not to the taxpayers who foot the bill for this judicial circus.
The courts didn’t stop at Carroll’s allegations. They let the jury hear from other women with similar accusations and played the infamous tape that’s been dragged out at every political witch trial in recent memory. The result? A verdict that all but handed a blank check to Carroll for claiming reputational harm, with the courts signaling that anything goes if it means putting Trump in the dock.
Legal System or Political Tool? Americans Are Right to Ask
Millions of Americans are watching this play out and asking the question the mainstream media won’t touch: is this justice, or just another example of the system being gamed by those with the right connections and the right politics? Carroll’s legal team is popping champagne, and left-wing pundits are cheering the verdict as a win for “accountability.” But anyone with a shred of common sense can see what’s really going on. The judicial process has become a stage for settling political vendettas, with Trump as the villain du jour. Meanwhile, everyday Americans get to witness a legal system that seems to care more about scoring points against political enemies than upholding the basic tenets of fairness, evidence, and due process.
Thursday, July 10th, 2025
So long, Old Man! The United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, bids thee farewell. pic.twitter.com/yjqrRsPtPT
— E. Jean Carroll (@ejeancarroll) July 10, 2025
Trump’s supporters see this as yet another politically motivated attack, and it’s hard to argue otherwise when every avenue for appeal gets slammed shut before the ink is dry on the last court order. Critics talk about accountability, but what about the accountability of the system itself? When the rules change every time the defendant’s name is Trump, the real losers are all of us who believe in the Constitution, the presumption of innocence, and equal justice under law.
What’s Next: A Precedent for Perpetual Litigation?
With $88 million in combined damages hanging over his head from both Carroll verdicts, Trump’s legal team is weighing a Supreme Court appeal. The high court is scheduled to hear arguments on related issues, but the outcome is anyone’s guess. Meanwhile, the case sets a chilling precedent: if you’re a high-profile conservative, you’d better be ready for endless litigation, media smear campaigns, and a justice system that bends over backward to accommodate your accusers. The message is clear—if you challenge the political establishment, the system will do everything in its power to break you, one lawsuit at a time.
To the Leftist implying Trump was involved with Epstein, to implicate him
Just stop.
Merrick Garland had the Epstein files for 4 years.
If that were true, you can bet he’d already be in prison
They went to great lengths to convict Trump of r@ping E Jean Carroll
pic.twitter.com/FAQ3GA2Xgy
—
𝕄𝔸𝔾𝔸 𝑵𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒚 ن ♱ (@45LVNancy) July 10, 2025
At a time when border security is crumbling, illegal immigrants are getting handouts, and government spending is out of control, our courts are busy waging war on the last president who tried to do something about it. Maybe it’s time to ask who’s really benefitting from this endless legal drama—because it sure isn’t the American people.
Sources:
Wikipedia: E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump
Justia: Carroll v. Trump, No. 23-793 (2d Cir. 2024)
UPI: Court strikes down Trump’s appeal in Carroll sexual abuse case
CrushTheLSATExam: Donald Trump Settlement & Lawsuits – History of Legal …
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editorial Team
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.conservativecardinal.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.