CIA review raises perjury concerns for Brennan over past Russia claims

Brace yourselves, patriots — current CIA Director John Ratcliffe has unleashed a revelation that could land former CIA boss John Brennan in hot water.

In a stunning move, Ratcliffe declassified a CIA internal review of the Obama-era 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian election interference, spotlighting flaws that might tie Brennan to perjury over his congressional testimony about the controversial Steele Dossier, as Breitbart reports.

Let’s step back to 2016 when Brennan led the CIA and oversaw the ICA, a report meant to analyze Russian meddling in the U.S. election. Conservatives and Trump supporters have long slammed this assessment for relying on the Steele Dossier, a document funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and packed with dubious claims like the infamous “pee tape” story. From the get-go, many on the right saw this as a politically driven hit job.

Exposing flaws in 2016 assessment

Fast forward to last week, when Ratcliffe released a review by career intelligence officials that confirms the ICA was seriously compromised. The report’s fifth page notes Brennan insisted on including the Steele Dossier despite pushback from experienced CIA mission center leaders. Seems like playing with fire might just burn you, doesn’t it?

Brennan didn’t merely suggest the dossier’s inclusion — he put his position in writing, cementing his stance on the matter. Yet, in closed-door congressional testimony, he reportedly claimed he didn’t push for its use, a contradiction that could spell perjury trouble. If accurate, that’s the kind of discrepancy that gets the attention of federal investigators.

Even more telling, Brennan told the Wall Street Journal in early 2017, “I would have no interest” in amplifying the dossier. Come again, sir? Ratcliffe’s review paints a starkly different picture, suggesting Brennan was far more involved than he let on publicly, a hypocrisy that grates on anyone valuing straight talk.

Ratcliffe’s crusade for transparency

Ratcliffe has a track record of challenging Brennan, having declassified documents in 2020 as Director of National Intelligence showing Brennan briefed former President Barack Obama on Clinton’s scheme to link Trump to Russia as a diversion from her email controversy. Now, as CIA Director, Ratcliffe seems intent on cleansing the agency of past politicization. As he stated on X, “Today’s report underscores that the 2016 IC Assessment was conducted through an atypical & corrupt process.”

Breaking that down, Ratcliffe’s words ring true for conservatives who’ve long decried the misuse of intelligence for partisan ends. His determination to expose these missteps feels like a much-needed course correction for an agency that should never play favorites. The right has consistently argued for neutrality in such institutions, and this report bolsters that case.

In a recent exclusive with Breitbart News, Ratcliffe called Brennan’s leadership “one of the worst things” to ever hit the CIA. That’s a sharp critique, but with the review’s findings, it’s not hard to see his point. For many conservatives, this isn’t just about one man — it’s about safeguarding trust in our national security framework.

Reactions from insiders, critics

Ratcliffe also tweeted last week, “All the world can now see the truth” about Brennan and others manipulating intelligence to target Trump. That’s a rallying cry for those on the right who feel vindicated after years of warning about deep-state overreach. It’s less about gloating and more about ensuring such actions aren’t repeated.

An unnamed congressional source praised Ratcliffe to Breitbart News, calling him a “genius” for getting career officers to admit the ICA’s flaws and hand over Brennan “on a silver platter.” While the admiration might be high, it reflects a sentiment among conservatives that accountability could finally be near. If the DOJ steps in, as hinted, this saga might take a dramatic turn.

Another source familiar with Brennan’s testimony told Breitbart News this reveals “how lawless” Brennan’s conduct was while deceiving Congress. It’s a tough accusation, but it echoes the frustration of many on the right who demand honesty from public officials. This isn’t personal vendetta — it’s about principle.

Potential consequences loom

Remember, the Steele Dossier was bankrolled by Clinton’s campaign and the DNC, who later shelled out a six-figure fine to settle an FEC investigation over misreported payments for it. This context isn’t trivial; it underscores how political motives can corrupt intelligence work, a core concern for conservatives who champion fairness in governance. The dossier’s role in the ICA wasn’t a mere oversight — it was a gamble now coming undone.

Former CIA officer Bryan Dean-Wright didn’t hold back, saying Brennan “should rot” in prison. While the phrasing is intense, it captures the deep anger among some in the intelligence world over leadership’s past choices. For conservatives, this is about protecting the integrity of institutions vital to our safety.

As Ratcliffe continues to unearth and critique these past errors, his work signals a broader mission to strip politics from intelligence — a cause that strikes a chord with conservatives weary of partisan influence in government. The big question remains: will the DOJ pursue perjury allegations against Brennan based on these revelations? One thing is certain — the scrutiny of 2016 isn’t fading, and for those who prioritize accountability over political games, that’s a development worth following closely.