Johnson Health Tech faces a class action lawsuit over defective BowFlex adjustable dumbbells that could potentially dislodge weight plates, causing serious injuries to users while offering inadequate compensation to those who purchased the product before April 2024.
Key Takeaways
- A class action lawsuit has been filed against Johnson Health Tech claiming their recall of 3.8 million BowFlex adjustable dumbbells is inadequate for customers who purchased before April 2024
- The defect allows weight plates to dislodge during use, with 337 reports to Nautilus/BowFlex including 111 injuries such as concussions and broken toes
- Recent purchasers (April 2024-May 2025) are eligible for full replacement or refund, while earlier customers receive only prorated vouchers worth $20-$95 for products that retail at $429-$799
- The lawsuit accuses the company of fraudulent business practices, false advertising, and putting profits above consumer safety
Dangerous Dumbbells and Discriminatory Compensation
In a significant consumer protection case, Elizabeth Cosin has filed a class action lawsuit against Johnson Health Tech over allegedly defective BowFlex adjustable dumbbells. The lawsuit targets not only the dangerous design flaw that allows weight plates to become loose and fall during use but also challenges what Cosin claims is an unfair recall compensation structure. The recall affects approximately 3.8 million BowFlex 552 (52.5 lb.) and 1090 (90 lb.) Adjustable Dumbbells sold across the United States, with the company acknowledging serious safety concerns after hundreds of incident reports.
The recall, announced on June 5 in cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, came after Johnson Health Tech received 12 reports of weight plates dislodging from handles, while Nautilus/BowFlex received a staggering 337 reports, including 111 injuries. These injuries aren’t minor inconveniences – they include concussions, broken toes, and other impact-related trauma. The lawsuit alleges that the company knew about these dangers but failed to take appropriate action until forced to by regulatory authorities.
Two-Tier Recall System Sparks Outrage
At the heart of the lawsuit is what appears to be a blatantly unfair two-tiered recall compensation system. Customers who purchased the defective dumbbells between April 23, 2024, and May 2025 are eligible for either a replacement product or a voucher for the full purchase price plus a one-year subscription to the company’s JRNY fitness app. However, customers who purchased their dumbbells before April 23, 2024 – likely the vast majority of owners – are offered only a prorated refund voucher based on the age of their purchase plus the same app subscription.
This disparity becomes even more troubling when examining the actual compensation amounts. The prorated vouchers range from a mere $20 to $95, while new BowFlex dumbbells retail for $429 (Model 552) and $799 (Model 1090). This means early adopters who trusted the BowFlex brand are being asked to accept pennies on the dollar for dangerous equipment that could cause serious injury. The lawsuit characterizes these vouchers as “effectively worthless” given the high price of replacement equipment and the restriction that vouchers can only be used on the BowFlex e-commerce website.
Legal Claims and Corporate Responsibility
The class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleges multiple violations by Johnson Health Tech, including fraudulent and unfair business practices, false advertising, and breach of warranty. The plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief along with compensatory, statutory, and monetary damages. The suit also demands a jury trial, suggesting the plaintiff believes the evidence of corporate malfeasance is compelling enough to convince a panel of everyday Americans.
The recall process itself places additional burdens on consumers, requiring them to stop using the dumbbells immediately, complete a claim form on the BowFlex website providing personal information, purchase details, and proof of purchase, then await verification before receiving a pre-paid shipping label and box to return the dumbbell handles and bases. This process forces consumers to go without their fitness equipment while navigating bureaucratic hurdles for what many consider inadequate compensation.
Corporate Profits Over Consumer Safety
The lawsuit effectively accuses Johnson Health Tech of prioritizing corporate profits over consumer safety and fair treatment. By implementing a recall system that minimizes the company’s financial exposure while offering inadequate compensation to long-term customers, the company appears to be attempting to turn a dangerous product situation into a marketing opportunity by pushing consumers toward new purchases and subscriptions to their digital fitness platform.
For conservative consumers who value corporate responsibility and fair business practices, this case represents yet another example of a corporation attempting to evade full accountability for product defects. While the company has acknowledged the danger by issuing a recall, the two-tiered compensation system raises serious questions about whether Johnson Health Tech is truly committed to making their customers whole or simply managing a public relations crisis at minimal cost to their bottom line.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Editor
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, http://www.restoreamericanglory.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.