The U.S. Supreme Court delivered multiple major wins for the Constitution and justice Friday, along with one ruling that undermined constitutional rights and potentially set a very dangerous precedent.
The Court ruled Friday that judges cannot unilaterally usurp executive authority, specifically in Trump’s efforts to reform the misdefinition of “birthright citizenship,” and that parents can opt out of their kids having to take sexually explicit, LGBTQ classes in schools. Yet just after ruling in favor of religious liberty in that case, SCOTUS ruled against it in another case.
As I wrote for PJ Media:
The case Kennedy v. Braidwood, formerly Becerra v. Braidwood (Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took over as HHS secretary during proceedings [against the Biden HHS]), was a flashpoint case deciding not only whether HHS can appoint certain officials without congressional and presidential approval, but whether or not the officials in question can override employers’ religious beliefs in medical funding. The decision is a loss therefore for religious liberty.
Braidwood Management is a Christian organization that didn’t want to fund HIV prevention under Obamacare, arguing on the grounds of their religious beliefs, which HHS and now—indirectly—SCOTUS denied.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Catherine Salgado
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://catherinesalgado.substack.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
