President Donald Trump announced on Friday after the Supreme Court ruled in his favor in a fight over nationwide injunctions from entry-level judges in the federal judiciary that a number of disputes now will be litigated.
Refugee resettlement, sanctuary cities, birthright citizenship, federal funding freezes, taxpayer money used for radical and injurious “trans” surgeries and more.
The actual dispute was over lower court judges who took over the decision-making for the executive branch and issued nationwide injunctions on Trump’s birthright citizenship order. The ruling Friday didn’t address that dispute.
But one senator, John Kennedy of Louisiana, put the legal controversy in terms for the common man: “Anybody who knows a law book from an L.L. Bean catalog knows that federal judges just made up the concept of universal injunctions. … If you disagree with a president or Congress, fill out a hurt feelings report – but you can’t put their actions on hold because you don’t like them.”
The Supreme Court found that the nationwide injunctions at issue went far beyond the authority of the local judges, and those injunctions now are limited to the actual case participants.
A huge rulling by the Supreme Court, smacking down the ridiculous process of nationwide injunctions. Under our system, everyone has to follow the law–including judges! pic.twitter.com/S3Os7RpV6F
— JD Vance (@JDVance) June 27, 2025
BREAKING: President Trump announces LIST OF POLICIES that were blocked on “nationwide injunctions,” but can now PROCEED thanks to SCOTUS.
– Ending birthright citizenship
– Ending funding for sanctuary cities
– Suspending refugee resettlement
– Freezing unnecessary federal… pic.twitter.com/WFzpzxlThw— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 27, 2025
Today SCOTUS made it possible for Americans to finally get what they voted for. No longer will rogue judges be able to seize executive power through bogus nationwide injunctions.
This is a huge win for the American people. pic.twitter.com/rlRmkdqJXh
— U.S. Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) June 27, 2025
Anybody who knows a law book from an L.L. Bean catalog knows that federal judges just made up the concept of universal injunctions.
If you disagree with a President or Congress, fill out a hurt feelings report—but you can’t put their actions on hold because you don’t like them. pic.twitter.com/SMPtkPsYKz
— John Kennedy (@SenJohnKennedy) June 27, 2025
.@POTUS: The Supreme Court has delivered a monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the RULE OF LAW in striking down the excessive use of nationwide injunctions pic.twitter.com/iQUR3xmMt8
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 27, 2025
Trump’s contention is that “birthright citizenship” has been misused to deliver citizenship to any person born on U.S. soil, when the Constitution actually stipulates that citizenship goes to those who are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S.
That raises the question whether those visiting in America, inside its borders with temporary permission, or even illegally, should be granted that exceptional right.
A report at the Gateway Pundit said, “DOJ Solicitor General John Sauer previously highlighted that federal judges have issued more than 40 nationwide injunctions since January, effectively stalling key executive actions, including the administration’s controversial order to end birthright citizenship for children born to non-citizen parents.”
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Bob Unruh
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.wnd.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
