This is not a drill. This is not data points or indicators that the direction appears to be leftward. These are overt laws which obliterate rule of law, the presumption of innocence, and criminality becoming arbitrary and whimsical at the state’s fancy based on dialectical processes rather than what may be true.
1. The first video must be seen in its entirety. Sorry about all the damned commercials. I wonder if Google puts way too many on videos which expose the revolutionary efforts by the COMINTERN Viceroy of Canada in order to get people not to watch it all the way.
I would like to add that although he does intimate it at the end, it should be stressed that what this bill C-2 does is far worse than merely making all procedure that protects privacy disappear. It is that what constitutes criminality itself will become arbitrary and of a dialectical nature. If you oppose the state or state narratives, reasons will be found to make you a criminal, if indeed they don’t simply say that you are an enemy of the people, as they did in the Soviet Union.
Please watch all of this.
2. A superb example of dialectical law:
A federal labour board has ruled that Employment Insurance’s call-centre management acted properly when it fired a probationary agent whose on-the-job tirade questioned Black Lives Matter protests and asked coworkers, “When will there be a day to remember white people?”
Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board adjudicator Christopher Rootham said the remarks showed the worker “unsuitable to serve in a diverse public-service workplace committed to equity and respect.”
Although the discussion had no link to her duties, Rootham wrote that behaviour during working hours is part of a probationary review and that dismissal was a “good-faith response.”
The six-month employee launched into her commentary on what a colleague described as a “slow day for calls,” criticising 2020 demonstrations where then-prime minister Justin Trudeau knelt with marchers.
Witnesses recalled her saying Black Lives Matter protesters wanted to erase history by scrapping brands like Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben and insisting that “it’s not like Hitler was walking around killing people.”
Affidavits also recounted her claims that Covid-19 threats were exaggerated, that masks were unnecessary and that media coverage of suspected graves at an indian residential school in Kamloops, B.C., was overblown because the events “happened years ago.”
I guess the joke was on her. There were no graves at all.
3. This is Germany, but its clearly in concert with Canada:
I think we can guess which politicians it is criminal to insult. The current German govt actually PAYS ANTIFA to attack, insult, lie about and otherwise frame AfD supporters as they attempt to make the party itself illegal.
4. Top constitutional lawyer slams Indigenous land acknowledgements as virtue signaling
Indigenous land acknowledgments have increased in Canada since unproven claims that unmarked graves were discovered at former residential schools gained media attention.
(LifeSiteNews) – One of Canada’s top constitutional lawyers gave a blunt assessment regarding his views of so-called Indigenous “land acknowledgements” that have become commonplace in all forms of Canadian society, saying they are nothing more than “hypocritical virtue signaling.”
“Aboriginal land acknowledgements are hypocritical virtue signaling by people who would never ever give away their own home for free to an Aboriginal,” Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) president John Carpay said in a recent video message.
“They like to pretend the land was stolen, but they themselves are not going to give up their own home or land and give that back to an Aboriginal.”
Carpay noted that in his view, if the land is “stolen,” then to “give it back.”
“If you’re not willing to give it back, don’t describe it as stolen land acknowledgements do nothing to help Aboriginals on reserves who are facing poverty and unemployment and high rates of suicide, drug addiction, often very corrupt local governments,” he reasoned.
Indigenous land acknowledgments have become common in Canada and have increased since the unproven claims that unmarked graves have been discovered at former residential schools gained media attention. Indeed, so prevalent that even King Charles III gave one recently while delivering the Throne Speech on behalf of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government.
John Carpay and his law firm, are at this point the last hope for rule of law, and actual constitutional rights in Canada. But he is wrong in a key aspect of his assertion. In fact, Land Claims are FAR MORE than mere virtue signalling. They are the dialectic narrative attack on Canadians to ensure they feel they have no grounds with which to object to the deracination of their culture, laws, beliefs, reproductive taboos or any other aspect of their identity whatsoever as it is destroyed in part by mass immigration.
The Land Claims narrative attack is to make it clear that Canadians have no claim on Canada and have no more right to be here and determine the laws and culture than say, 60 million Muslims, Africans and Chinese. And this is FAR MORE than BS virtue signalling.
At a Holocaust memorial ceremony that took place a week or so ago after the monument had been vandalized, the first speaker invited to talk to those people who had gathered there was a woman who identified as an Algonquin. It is pretty clear what she is saying to the Jewish community here.
Tomorrow I hope to write up a bit about the foreign operatives who did a needle attack on a Music festival in France.
One might hope it might give the French a little greater understanding of the events of Oct. 7th at another music festival in Israel. But that would not be the actual issue.
Music festivals, and all Western cultural events, certainly things like Christmas Festivals and any other mainstay of Western Civilization will increasingly disappear. The auspices will be public safety, as it is so much collectivist totalitarianism. After Covid and the Vaxx mandates, no one should be arguing with me about that.
But clearly we see the process of encouraging, protecting to the max, even to the extent of not allowing criticism of illegal public gatherings such as Muslims blocking roads with public spectacles of religious ritual behaviour, fully unnecessary by any religious standard but an excellent way to assert dominance. Those acts are protected. But hundreds of people being pricked by needles, or run over at Christmas markets, well those are technically illegal but the results of all this are a foregone conclusion. Western people are not allowed to defend themselves in any meaningful way and deference? forget it.
Our own governments pay invaders to invade.
The land claims bollux is entirely about delegitimizing any argument using what we call, ‘temporal relativism’ (you did this back then so you have no right to object to others doing this same awful thing now even though if it was so awful, why should it be OK now and not then?) against our utter deracination by mass immigration.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Eeyore
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://vladtepesblog.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
