In a significant legal development, a federal appeals court has ruled against President Donald Trump’s bid to overturn a $5 million verdict.
This decision affirms the jury’s finding that Trump was liable for sexual abuse and defamation concerning allegations brought by E. Jean Carroll, as Newsmax reports.
The legal battle stems from accusations made by Carroll, who claimed that Trump sexually assaulted her in a department store around 1996 and later defamed her. The case gained widespread attention, highlighting the ongoing legal challenges facing the president.
Appeals court issues ruling
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan issued the judgment, with the panel of judges narrowly divided on the matter. This ruling maintains the jury’s original verdict reached in May 2023, which found Trump had abused and defamed Carroll, though rape was not established.
In his appeal, Trump argued the inclusion of what he characterized as inflammatory evidence compromised the fairness of his trial. Among the contentious pieces was a 2005 “Access Hollywood” video that sparked significant public and media attention.
Allegations presented during the proceedings were not limited to Carroll’s claims. Other accusations surfaced, including an incident involving Jessica Leeds, who alleged Trump groped her in the late 1970s, and Natasha Stoynoff, who accused him of forcibly kissing her in 2005.
Defense, counterarguments raised
Trump has consistently denied Carroll’s accusations, asserting that the claims were fabricated for publicity and to sell her memoir. In his defense, he also stated that Carroll was “not my type,” questioning the credibility of her allegations.
Additionally, Trump is seeking to overturn an $83.3 million defamation verdict linked to Carroll’s 1996 allegations. His legal team contends that as a former president, he should have certain immunities, a position that remains under judicial scrutiny.
The appeals process in the $83.3 million defamation suit continues, with Trump’s legal team maintaining that his statements made in 2019 and 2022 were protected under his right to defend his character against false assertions.
National spotlight remains on legal battle
The legal saga kept Trump in the national spotlight long after his first term, continuing into his second, underscoring the enduring impact of high-profile litigation on public figures. According to analysts, the case also reflects broader themes of accountability and reputational management.
Apart from the specific allegations in the Carroll case, the verdict and subsequent rulings bear implications for other pending legal matters involving Trump. The president continues to face a host of legal challenges on various fronts, adding complexity to his public life.
As the proceedings unfold, the legal community watches closely, considering the implications of such high-stakes verdicts on the justice system and public perception. Meanwhile, the appeals process and related developments remain pivotal to ongoing debates about defamation and liability.
Click this link for the original source of this article.
Author: Mae Slater
This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://www.conservativejournalreview.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.
